Hello internals,
As a follow up from the "Allow null as a stand-alone type" where the main
talking point was to also allow false to be used as a stand-alone type, a
new slightly modified RFC is now proposed:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null-false-standalone-types
The implementation has been updated to reflect the new RFC.
Best regards,
George P. Banyard
Hello internals,
As a follow up from the "Allow null as a stand-alone type" where the main
talking point was to also allow false to be used as a stand-alone type, a
new slightly modified RFC is now proposed:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null-false-standalone-typesThe implementation has been updated to reflect the new RFC.
The new RFC has a link to implementation and a link to the previous RFC
(which has a link back to the new one) but I had to search for the original
discussion, so here it is: https://externals.io/message/116188
(+1 for me, with or without false)
Regards,
--
Guilliam Xavier
Hello internals,
I'd like to open voting for this tomorrow.
I've expanded a bit the caveat about the specific Reflection change this
RFC introduces with handling of null|false compared to other T|null types.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null-false-standalone-types
If there are some final comments please let me know.
Best regards,
George P. Banyard