Compiler Optimizations

6 years ago by Chase Peeler — view source — reply

unread

I brought this up on another thread, but it wasn't addressed (which is
fine, since it was somewhat off-topic). I thought it might be
worth bringing up in its own thread, though.

In the other thread, someone had mentioned the following compiler
optimization

foreach(\array_keys($arr) as $key) {

and quietly transform that into:

foreach ($arr as $key => $_unusedVariableNameThatIsntEvenSpilledToTheScope)
{

I would be more likely to write:
$keys = array_keys($arr);
foreach($keys as $key){
Which would prevent me from being able to take advantage of the
optimization.

So, what I was wondering, is if there are other optimizations I might be
missing out on, and if so, are they documented anywhere?

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

6 years ago by Benas IML — view source — reply

unread

Hey,

During my free time, I'm implementing that specific array_keys
optimization. I'm not planning on supporting cases like yours (i. e.
indirection through a variable) since there's no point in doing that. And
also, it's not feasible to support every use case. Should we also support
cases like this?

$a = 'array_keys';
$b = $a(...);
$c = 'b';

foreach ($$c as $key) {
    ...
}

Obviously not. \array_keys optimization will work the same way as an
optimized strlen function works.

That means that the optimization is only going to be applied if the
array_keys function is used directly in the foreach loop and only if a)
either the namespace is global b) or \array_keys(...)/use function array_keys is used.

Best regards,
Benas

I brought this up on another thread, but it wasn't addressed (which is
fine, since it was somewhat off-topic). I thought it might be
worth bringing up in its own thread, though.

In the other thread, someone had mentioned the following compiler
optimization

foreach(\array_keys($arr) as $key) {

and quietly transform that into:

foreach ($arr as $key => $_unusedVariableNameThatIsntEvenSpilledToTheScope)
{

I would be more likely to write:
$keys = array_keys($arr);
foreach($keys as $key){
Which would prevent me from being able to take advantage of the
optimization.

So, what I was wondering, is if there are other optimizations I might be
missing out on, and if so, are they documented anywhere?

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

6 years ago by Chase Peeler — view source — reply

unread

I wasn't proposing that my example be supported. I'm totally okay with the
fact that it doesn't. My question was about whether or not those kinds of
optimizations are documented anywhere so that developers can make sure they
don't miss out on them by not fitting the proper pattern.

Hey,

During my free time, I'm implementing that specific array_keys
optimization. I'm not planning on supporting cases like yours (i. e.
indirection through a variable) since there's no point in doing that. And
also, it's not feasible to support every use case. Should we also support
cases like this?
$a = 'array_keys';
$b = $a(...);
$c = 'b';

foreach ($$c as $key) {
    ...
}
Obviously not. \array_keys optimization will work the same way as an
optimized strlen function works.

That means that the optimization is only going to be applied if the
array_keys function is used directly in the foreach loop and only if a)
either the namespace is global b) or \array_keys(...)/use function array_keys is used.

Best regards,
Benas

I brought this up on another thread, but it wasn't addressed (which is
fine, since it was somewhat off-topic). I thought it might be
worth bringing up in its own thread, though.

In the other thread, someone had mentioned the following compiler
optimization

foreach(\array_keys($arr) as $key) {

and quietly transform that into:

foreach ($arr as $key =>
$_unusedVariableNameThatIsntEvenSpilledToTheScope)
{

I would be more likely to write:
$keys = array_keys($arr);
foreach($keys as $key){
Which would prevent me from being able to take advantage of the
optimization.

So, what I was wondering, is if there are other optimizations I might be
missing out on, and if so, are they documented anywhere?

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

6 years ago by Benas IML — view source — reply

unread

Ah, sorry! Misread your post. Anyways, the compiler doesn't transform
\array_keys() yet, so there's no optimization for that.

As for other compiler optimizations, 2 that I know that the compiler does
is:

Binary OP evaluation i. e. 2 * 2 does not yield ZEND_ADD opcode but
is instead computed by the compiler directly.
There are special functions that have their own opcodes. You can learn
more about those here:
https://phpinternals.net/articles/optimising_internal_functions_via_new_opcode_instructions

Best regards,
Benas

I wasn't proposing that my example be supported. I'm totally okay with the
fact that it doesn't. My question was about whether or not those kinds of
optimizations are documented anywhere so that developers can make sure they
don't miss out on them by not fitting the proper pattern.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:40 AM Benas IML benas.molis.iml@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,

During my free time, I'm implementing that specific array_keys
optimization. I'm not planning on supporting cases like yours (i. e.
indirection through a variable) since there's no point in doing that. And
also, it's not feasible to support every use case. Should we also support
cases like this?
$a = 'array_keys';
$b = $a(...);
$c = 'b';

foreach ($$c as $key) {
    ...
}
Obviously not. \array_keys optimization will work the same way as an
optimized strlen function works.

That means that the optimization is only going to be applied if the
array_keys function is used directly in the foreach loop and only if a)
either the namespace is global b) or \array_keys(...)/use function array_keys is used.

Best regards,
Benas

I brought this up on another thread, but it wasn't addressed (which is
fine, since it was somewhat off-topic). I thought it might be
worth bringing up in its own thread, though.

In the other thread, someone had mentioned the following compiler
optimization

foreach(\array_keys($arr) as $key) {

and quietly transform that into:

foreach ($arr as $key =>
$_unusedVariableNameThatIsntEvenSpilledToTheScope)
{

I would be more likely to write:
$keys = array_keys($arr);
foreach($keys as $key){
Which would prevent me from being able to take advantage of the
optimization.

So, what I was wondering, is if there are other optimizations I might be
missing out on, and if so, are they documented anywhere?

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com
--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

6 years ago by Chase Peeler — view source — reply

unread

Ah, sorry! Misread your post. Anyways, the compiler doesn't transform
\array_keys() yet, so there's no optimization for that.

As for other compiler optimizations, 2 that I know that the compiler does
is:

Binary OP evaluation i. e. 2 * 2 does not yield ZEND_ADD opcode but
is instead computed by the compiler directly.

There are special functions that have their own opcodes. You can learn
more about those here:

https://phpinternals.net/articles/optimising_internal_functions_via_new_opcode_instructions

That's a good starting point, thanks.

Best regards,
Benas
I wasn't proposing that my example be supported. I'm totally okay with
the fact that it doesn't. My question was about whether or not those kinds
of optimizations are documented anywhere so that developers can make sure
they don't miss out on them by not fitting the proper pattern.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:40 AM Benas IML benas.molis.iml@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,

During my free time, I'm implementing that specific array_keys
optimization. I'm not planning on supporting cases like yours (i. e.
indirection through a variable) since there's no point in doing that. And
also, it's not feasible to support every use case. Should we also support
cases like this?
$a = 'array_keys';
$b = $a(...);
$c = 'b';

foreach ($$c as $key) {
    ...
}
Obviously not. \array_keys optimization will work the same way as an
optimized strlen function works.

That means that the optimization is only going to be applied if the
array_keys function is used directly in the foreach loop and only if a)
either the namespace is global b) or \array_keys(...)/use function array_keys is used.

Best regards,
Benas

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, 4:23 PM Chase Peeler chasepeeler@gmail.com
wrote:

I brought this up on another thread, but it wasn't addressed (which is
fine, since it was somewhat off-topic). I thought it might be
worth bringing up in its own thread, though.

In the other thread, someone had mentioned the following compiler
optimization

foreach(\array_keys($arr) as $key) {

and quietly transform that into:

foreach ($arr as $key =>
$_unusedVariableNameThatIsntEvenSpilledToTheScope)
{

I would be more likely to write:
$keys = array_keys($arr);
foreach($keys as $key){
Which would prevent me from being able to take advantage of the
optimization.

So, what I was wondering, is if there are other optimizations I might be
missing out on, and if so, are they documented anywhere?

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com
--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com

--
Chase Peeler
chasepeeler@gmail.com