unread
Morning internals,
The vote for weakrefs is closed and has been accepted.
Because of feedback received very late during voting from non-voting
contributors/community members, the implementation will be slightly
different to that in the RFC - it was pointed out that it's more useful if
there is only one weakref for every object, and it happens to simplify the
internal implementation also. The only difference is the __construct will
be replaced with a named constructor so that we may achieve this: It will
still have the same interface as accepted, but with a different name for
constructor and simpler implementation.
Cheers
Joe