Insofar as conversation started what do you think about CI service that supports big endian platform?On Feb 2, 2019 15:09, "Christoph M. Becker" cmbecker69@gmx.de wrote:
On 02.02.2019 at 14:31, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:06 PM Christoph M. Becker cmbecker69@gmx.de
wrote:On 02.02.2019 at 13:18, Nikita Popov wrote:
I just learned about the Azure Pipelines (
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/pipelines/) offering,
which offers open source projects 10 parallel builds with unlimited
minutes. Assuming there's no other catch here, it might be worthwhile to
migrate our Windows CI jobs to Azure Pipelines.An alternative to consider is using Travis for Windows CI[1], too.
It's an option, but I think we're generally better off using multiple CI
platforms to increase the number of parallel builds we get.Next to the builds we already have, I think it would be very good to also
have a macos builder (this is supported by both Travis and Azure Pipelines,
but needs someone familiar with the platform to set things up) and a 32-bit
builder (probably a -m32 build on x86_64 Linux). That would bring us to a
total of six builds, which would probably make the Travis queue somewhat
slow if we used it exclusively.Ah, makes perfect sense (a FreeBSD CI would be nice as well).
Regarding the execution time of the test suite, it might be sensible to
also have a look at PR #2822[1] and/or PFTT2[2].[1] https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2822
[2] https://git.php.net/?p=pftt2.git--
Christoph M. Becker