# http://php.net/usage.php

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/97604
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/97604
- Started by Stanislav Malyshev on 2017-01-08T23:51:11+00:00
- Messages: 4
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #97604 — Stanislav Malyshev — 2017-01-08T23:51:11+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/97604#97604

Hi!

With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
(or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com

---

## #97606 — Alice Wonder — 2017-01-09T00:01:59+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/97604#97606 · In reply to: #97604

> Hi!
>
> With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
> (or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
> http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)
>

Oh wow yeah, that IMHO needs to go.

I've never been fond of those kind of statistics anyway, often the 
popular product is the product that puts money into marketing and isn't 
really any better (sometimes far worse) than the competition quality- 
and security-wise.

PHP at this point is extremely well established as an enterprise capable 
server-side scripting language.

---

## #97608 — Christoph M. Becker — 2017-01-09T01:18:46+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/97604#97608 · In reply to: #97604

> With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
> (or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
> http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)

I can't see any particular value in this page, so I'm +1 on removing it.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

---

## #97609 — Kalle Sommer Nielsen — 2017-01-09T04:52:10+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/97604#97609 · In reply to: #97608

2017-01-09 2:18 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>:
> 
>
> > […]
>
> I can't see any particular value in this page, so I'm +1 on removing it.

Removed in 3abb7f2da6f2806a28cd272b13cd36fe81f8c882. I intentionally
left the graph image there.

-- 
regards,

Kalle Sommer Nielsen
kalle@php.net