# Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-07-30 - Thread: https://externals.io/message/87384 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/87384 - Started by lp_benchmark_robot on 2015-07-30T08:29:09+00:00 - Messages: 8 - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #87384 — lp_benchmark_robot — 2015-07-30T08:29:09+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87384 Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-07-30 05:00:00+03:00 commit: ae1a4f47e6bd9f8d1d969e5080dae60136d7444b revision_date: 2015-07-29 21:00:43+02:00 environment: Haswell-EP cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB mem: 128 GB os: CentOS 7.1 kernel: Linux 3.10.0-229.4.2.el7.x86_64 Note: Baseline results were generated using release php-7.0.0beta1, with hash ad8a73dd55c087de465ad80e8715611693bb1460 from 2015-07-07 16:02:13+00:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- benchmark executable unit change since change since yesterday php-7.0.0beta1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wordpress 4.2.2 cgi -T10000 php opc=on fps -1.36% -0.78% Drupal 7.36 cgi -T10000 php opc=on fps -0.08% 0.25% MediaWiki 1.23.9 cgi -T5000 php opc=on fps -0.97% -1.16% bench.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 0.65% -3.81% micro_bench.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 2.28% 2.94% mandelbrot.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 0.06% -1.76% Our lab does a nightly source pull and build of the PHP project and measures performance changes against the previous stable version and the previous nightly measurement. This is provided as a service to the community so that quality issues with current hardware can be identified quickly. Intel technologies' features and benefits depend on system configuration and may require enabled hardware, software or service activation. Performance varies depending on system configuration. No license (express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise) to any intellectual property rights is granted by this document. Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade. This document may contain information on products, services and/or processes in development. Contact your Intel representative to obtain the latest forecast, schedule, specifications and roadmaps. The products and services described may contain defects or errors known as errata which may cause deviations from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. (C) 2015 Intel Corporation. --- ## #87388 — Pierre Joye — 2015-07-30T09:57:58+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87388 · In reply to: #87384 Hi, Does someone has a contact there? It would be nicer to have these results combined with what we pushed on qa.php.net as well. Cheers, Pierre On Jul 30, 2015 3:29 PM, "lp_benchmark_robot" wrote: > Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-07-30 05:00:00+03:00 > > commit: ae1a4f47e6bd9f8d1d969e5080dae60136d7444b > > revision_date: 2015-07-29 21:00:43+02:00 > > environment: Haswell-EP > > cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping > 2, LLC 45 MB > > mem: 128 GB > > os: CentOS 7.1 > > kernel: Linux 3.10.0-229.4.2.el7.x86_64 > > > > Note: Baseline results were generated using release php-7.0.0beta1, with > hash > > ad8a73dd55c087de465ad80e8715611693bb1460 from 2015-07-07 16:02:13+00:00 > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > benchmark executable unit change since change > since > > yesterday > php-7.0.0beta1 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Wordpress 4.2.2 cgi -T10000 php opc=on fps -1.36% > -0.78% > > Drupal 7.36 cgi -T10000 php opc=on fps -0.08% > 0.25% > > MediaWiki 1.23.9 cgi -T5000 php opc=on fps -0.97% > -1.16% > > bench.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 0.65% > -3.81% > > micro_bench.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 2.28% > 2.94% > > mandelbrot.php cgi -T1 php opc=on sec 0.06% > -1.76% > > > > > > Our lab does a nightly source pull and build of the PHP project and > measures performance changes against the previous stable version and the > previous nightly measurement. This is provided as a service to the > community so that quality issues with current hardware can be identified > quickly. > > > > Intel technologies' features and benefits depend on system configuration > and may require enabled hardware, software or service activation. > Performance varies depending on system configuration. No license (express > or implied, by estoppel or otherwise) to any intellectual property rights > is granted by this document. > > Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without > limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a > particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising > from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade. This > document may contain information on products, services and/or processes in > development. Contact your Intel representative to obtain the latest > forecast, schedule, specifications and roadmaps. The products and services > described may contain defects or errors known as errata which may cause > deviations from published specifications. > > Current characterized errata are available on request. > > > (C) 2015 Intel Corporation. --- ## #87389 — Niklas Keller — 2015-07-30T10:46:39+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87389 · In reply to: #87388 2015-07-30 11:57 GMT+02:00 Pierre Joye : > Hi, > > Does someone has a contact there? > > It would be nicer to have these results combined with what we pushed on > qa.php.net as well. > > Cheers, > Pierre Thought about that as well, results per mail aren't that useful, especially as they're badly formatted for me in GMail (no fixed font). A graph visualizing those numbers would be nice. Regards, Niklas --- ## #87395 — Andone — 2015-07-30T12:42:36+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87395 > -----Original Message----- > From: Niklas Keller [mailto:me@kelunik.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 1:47 PM > To: Pierre Joye > Cc: lp_benchmark_robot; PHP internals; lp@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-07-30 > > 2015-07-30 11:57 GMT+02:00 Pierre Joye : > > > […] > > > Thought about that as well, results per mail aren't that useful, > especially as they're badly formatted for me in GMail (no fixed font). > A graph visualizing those numbers would be nice. > > Regards, Niklas Hi Guys, We are glad that our small ticking spam start to be observed :) ! We would like to offer valuable information to the community related to performance trends of the PHP project on Intel platforms based on daily builds and we are open for suggestions for making these results relevant. We chose to share our numbers as plain text mails for easily seeing the summary snapshots on discussion lists without the need of other clicks. Everybody agrees that plain text is ugly and, yes, you need to have fixed font in place for having the table formatted correctly. Let’s discuss a better way of doing; integration with qa.php.net is possible if we find the right interface for sharing data in an automated way. Normally should be the official entry for feedbacks and requests but, unfortunately, it is not yet operational, so I will be your direct contact as I am part of the team which deploys this project. Kind regards, Bogdan --- ## #87398 — Niklas Keller — 2015-07-30T13:12:18+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87398 · In reply to: #87395 2015-07-30 14:42 GMT+02:00 Andone, Bogdan : > > […] > > Hi Guys, > > We are glad that our small ticking spam start to be observed :) ! > > We would like to offer valuable information to the community related to > performance trends of the PHP project on Intel platforms based on daily > builds > and we are open for suggestions for making these results relevant. > > We chose to share our numbers as plain text mails for easily seeing the > summary > snapshots on discussion lists without the need of other clicks. > Everybody agrees that plain text is ugly and, yes, you need to have fixed > font in > place for having the table formatted correctly. Let’s discuss a better way > of doing; > integration with qa.php.net is possible if we find the right interface > for sharing > data in an automated way. > > Normally should be the official entry for feedbacks and > requests but, > unfortunately, it is not yet operational, so I will be your direct contact > as I am part > of the team which deploys this project. > > > Kind regards, > Bogdan > > Hi Bogdan, I think absolute numbers (instead of a %-change) would be better suited for visualizing performance over time. Regards, Niklas --- ## #87422 — Christopher Jones — 2015-07-30T22:11:43+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87422 · In reply to: #87398 > 2015-07-30 14:42 GMT+02:00 Andone, Bogdan : > > > […] > Hi Bogdan, > > I think absolute numbers (instead of a %-change) would be better suited for > visualizing performance over time. > > Regards, Niklas > I agree on using absolute numbers. With percentages it is not immediately obvious whether the change was good or bad. Including the build options would be good. Chris -- http://twitter.com/ghrd --- ## #87434 — Andone — 2015-07-31T14:01:24+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87434 · In reply to: #87422 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Jones [mailto:christopher.jones@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 1:12 AM > To: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-07-30 > > > > > > […] > pushed > > […] > font). > > […] > to > > […] > daily > > […] > the > > […] > fixed > > […] > better way > > […] > interface > > […] > and > > […] > contact > > […] > suited for > > […] > > I agree on using absolute numbers. With percentages it is not > immediately obvious whether the change was good or bad. > > Including the build options would be good. > > Chris > > -- > http://twitter.com/ghrd > > -- > > We can work on build option documentation. Most probably we will offer a link on the 01.org containing details on the environment configuration. Concerning absolute numbers I am afraid it will be difficult to publish them in this way. Our intention is to allow you to see progresses trend in the context of Zend PHP project only. We would like to avoid the temptation to use the absolute numbers for comparisons with other projects; they might be misleading and could drive to wrong conclusions if they are removed from the context. If the PHP baseline is relevant, the fact you see absolute numbers or percents should not make a real difference. We chose php-7.0.0beta1 in a somehow subjective way as they are no official PHP7 releases yet but we can take a PHP5.x release baseline if it looks more relevant. Kind Regards, Bogdan --- ## #87819 — Pasindu De Silva — 2015-08-20T15:22:36+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/87384#87819 · In reply to: #87434 Hi Andone Is there a way to better send the results maybe csv attachment or dump some where. I can build a small integration. +1 Pasindu On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Andone, Bogdan wrote: > > […] > > We can work on build option documentation. Most probably we will offer a > link on the 01.org containing details on the environment configuration. > Concerning absolute numbers I am afraid it will be difficult to publish > them in this way. Our intention is to allow you to see progresses trend in > the context of Zend PHP project only. We would like to avoid the temptation > to use the absolute numbers for comparisons with other projects; they might > be misleading and could drive to wrong conclusions if they are removed from > the context. > > If the PHP baseline is relevant, the fact you see absolute numbers or > percents should not make a real difference. We chose php-7.0.0beta1 in a > somehow subjective way as they are no official PHP7 releases yet but we can > take a PHP5.x release baseline if it looks more relevant. > > Kind Regards, > Bogdan > -- *Pasindu De Silva**ppasindud@gmail.com *