# [VOTE] [RFC] continue output buffering

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/84468
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/84468
- Started by Michael Wallner on 2015-03-09T12:45:16+00:00
- Messages: 8
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #84468 — Michael Wallner — 2015-03-09T12:45:16+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84468

Hi, I’d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob — any objections?

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob>

Regards,
Mike

---

## #84493 — Yasuo Ohgaki — 2015-03-10T02:10:58+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84493 · In reply to: #84468

Hi Mike,



> Hi, I’d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob — any objections?
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
> > […]
>

+1
I don't mind at all even if you fix this as simple bug fix :)

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

---

## #84515 — Mike Willbanks — 2015-03-10T18:30:02+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84515 · In reply to: #84468

Hi Mike,



> Hi, I’d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob — any objections?
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
> > […]
>
>
I think it would be good to put an example of why this is immensely useful
in the RFC.  Conditions such as when a user aborts but there is a
transactional situation where the output is necessary of publishing
elsewhere.

But yes, this is a huge +1.

---

## #84526 — Matteo Beccati — 2015-03-11T07:26:10+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84526 · In reply to: #84493

> Hi Mike,
>
> 
>
> > […]
>
> +1
> I don't mind at all even if you fix this as simple bug fix :)

I would agree with Yasuo. It seems like a bug fix to me: maybe a RFC is 
not necessary.


Cheers
-- 
Matteo Beccati

Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/

---

## #84527 — Michael Wallner — 2015-03-11T08:01:50+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84527 · In reply to: #84526

Hi all!

> 
> 
> 
> > […]
> 
> I would agree with Yasuo. It seems like a bug fix to me: maybe a RFC is not necessary.

To me, too. But it looked controversial enough to start an RFC instead of a commit war.
I think the behaviour pre-5.4 was weird and post-5.4 just of limited use, to say the least.

Regards,
Mike

---

## #84536 — Patrick ALLAERT — 2015-03-11T11:09:49+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84536 · In reply to: #84468

Le lun. 9 mars 2015 à 13:45, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> a écrit :

> Hi, I’d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob — any objections?
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
> > […]
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>

No objections.

It didn't really require an RFC IMO, but it doesn't hurt.

+1

---

## #84540 — Julien Pauli — 2015-03-11T12:58:22+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84540 · In reply to: #84536

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>
wrote:

> Le lun. 9 mars 2015 à 13:45, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> a écrit :
>
> > […]
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
> > […]
>
> +1 , its common sense to me :-)

Julien

---

## #84805 — Michael Wallner — 2015-03-15T07:44:40+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/84468#84805 · In reply to: #84540

Voting just started on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob>
I’ll close the poll in a week.

Thanks,
Mike