# --enable-all - Thread: https://externals.io/message/722 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/722 - Started by marcus.boerger@t-online.de on 2003-04-05T14:56:37+00:00 - Messages: 4 - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #722 — marcus.boerger@t-online.de — 2003-04-05T14:56:37+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/722#722 I just noticed the fact that --enable-all also works for all --with-xyz by being mailed about it. IMHO there should be an --with-all. This because we have a clear difference between --enable-xy and --with-xy. This difference should hold for --enable-all, too. regards marcus --- ## #725 — marcus.boerger@t-online.de — 2003-04-05T15:32:54+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/722#725 · In reply to: #722 At 17:28 05.04.2003, Peter Neuman wrote: >Hello, > >"Marcus Börger" : > > > […] > >which is actually differentiated between --with-xyz and --enable-xyz? --enable-xyz is for ectension not depending on external libraries and --with-xyz is for extensions depending on external libraries. marcus --- ## #728 — marcus.boerger@t-online.de — 2003-04-05T18:08:47+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/722#728 · In reply to: #722 At 19:48 05.04.2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > > > […] > > I never advertized --enable-all. It was just a side-effect of > --disable-all and should never be used by anyone. > > I removed the --enable-all from the configure help now. > I'll disable it fully later.. > Jani, IMO --enable-all is a good thing but it shouldn't apply to --with extensions. So perhaps we should have an undocumented --with-all and make --enable-all what it is supposed to. marcus --- ## #729 — Rasmus Lerdorf — 2003-04-05T18:11:10+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/722#729 · In reply to: #728 > Jani, IMO --enable-all is a good thing but it shouldn't apply to --with > extensions. So perhaps we should have an undocumented --with-all > and make --enable-all what it is supposed to. --with-all is rather unrealistic, isn't it? Some of the --with flags are mutually exclusive as well so you can never have a real --with-all. -Rasmus