# RFC pages with mismatching information - Thread: https://externals.io/message/69918 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/69918 - Started by renan.saddam@gmail.com on 2013-10-28T16:51:58+00:00 - Messages: 7 - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #69918 — renan.saddam@gmail.com — 2013-10-28T16:51:58+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69918 Hi guys, While checking a RFC page I noticed the Status was showing "Under discussion" while the RFC list (https://wiki.php.net/rfc) was showing it was Implemented. Then I checked several other RFC's and quite a lot of them have mismatching information. I compiled a list so somebody with access could revisit and fix them. 5.3 Accepted: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceresolution - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceseparator - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/heredoc-with-double-quotes (says Accepted but also Implemented) - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/lsb_parentself_forwarding - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/e-user-deprecated-warning Under discussion: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm/ini_syntax - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/newinis 5.4 Accepted: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/functionarraydereferencing Voting: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/error-formatting-for-developers "Committed": - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/horizontalreuse - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags Under discussion: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal-of-deprecated-features - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/runtimecache - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zendsignals - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/callable "Dead as no one seem to be interested in" (my favorite status): - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections "Old hat": - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/new-output-api 5.5 Accepted: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus "Commited": - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference Under discussion: - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/curl-file-upload Thanks! -- Renan Gonçalves aka renan.saddam Software Engineer at TrueServer B.V. CakePHP Core Developer W: renangoncalves.com T: twitter.com/renan_saddam M: +31 (0)6 4662 1860 L: Amsterdam, The Netherlands --- ## #69928 — renan.saddam@gmail.com — 2013-10-29T09:56:34+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69928 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Christopher Jones < christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote: > While you're looking at them, it would help if you could mail what change > needs to be made to each one. Each one should have the right Status, which according to the RFC list page is Implemented. Sorry if I wasn't clear on my initial post. -- Renan Gonçalves aka renan.saddam Software Engineer at TrueServer B.V. CakePHP Core Developer W: renangoncalves.com T: twitter.com/renan_saddam M: +31 (0)6 4662 1860 L: Amsterdam, The Netherlands --- ## #69945 — Nikita Popov — 2013-10-29T17:42:17+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69945 · In reply to: #69918 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Renan Gonçalves wrote: > Hi guys, > > While checking a RFC page I noticed the Status was showing "Under > discussion" while the RFC list (https://wiki.php.net/rfc) was showing it > was Implemented. > > Then I checked several other RFC's and quite a lot of them have mismatching > information. I compiled a list so somebody with access could revisit and > fix them. > Thanks, I updated all statuses of the listed RFCs to "Implemented in PHP 5.x". Only one I didn't change is https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections, because I have no idea whether that actually landed or not. Nikita --- ## #69947 — Andrea Faulds — 2013-10-29T18:36:47+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69947 · In reply to: #69945 > > Thanks, I updated all statuses of the listed RFCs to "Implemented in PHP > 5.x". Only one I didn't change is > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections, > because I have no idea whether that actually landed or not. > Hello, As a related note, the "How To Create an RFC" page (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto) states this: > 8. When your feature is implemented in PHP, update the RFC with: > i. the version(s) it was merged to > ii. a link to the git commit(s) > iii. a link to the PHP manual entry for the feature Some of your own RFCs don't have this, nor do others. I think this should also be addressed. Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ --- ## #69948 — Christopher Jones — 2013-10-29T18:52:53+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69948 · In reply to: #69947 > > > > > […] > > Hello, > > As a related note, the "How To Create an RFC" page (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto) states this: > > > […] > > Some of your own RFCs don't have this, nor do others. I think this should also be addressed. > > Thanks. > The creation steps were not in their current form until after a number of RFCs were created. Not all RFCs will contain the information that they mention. I don't think there is a huge value in retro updating old RFCs - but feel free to do it. If the PHP Manual doesn't have useful information about the feature (description and implementation version), then log a bug or fix the manual directly. Chris -- christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd Free PHP & Oracle book: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html --- ## #69949 — Andrea Faulds — 2013-10-29T18:54:48+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69949 · In reply to: #69948 > > The creation steps were not in their current form until after a number > of RFCs were created. Not all RFCs will contain the information that > they mention. I don't think there is a huge value in retro updating > old RFCs - but feel free to do it. > Ah, I see. I was unaware of that, and I agree. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ --- ## #69950 — Christopher Jones — 2013-10-29T19:04:34+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/69918#69950 · In reply to: #69949 > > > > > […] > > Ah, I see. I was unaware of that, and I agree. > If you find any RFC created after June 2013 that is lacking, prod the authors. Chris -- christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd Free PHP & Oracle book: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html