# [RFC] send/recvmsg() wrappers in ext/socket

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/65092
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/65092
- Started by Gustavo Lopes on 2013-01-22T17:23:59+00:00
- Messages: 5
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #65092 — Gustavo Lopes — 2013-01-22T17:23:59+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/65092#65092

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sendrecvmsg

The module ext/sockets, a wrapper around the sockets API, does not include  
support to recvmsg() and sendmsg(). This RFC addresses this shortcoming by  
support introducing limited (only a few types of messages are supported)  
support for these functions.

-- 
Gustavo Lopes

---

## #65496 — Gustavo Lopes — 2013-01-30T12:25:12+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/65092#65496 · In reply to: #65092

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:23:59 +0100, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>  
wrote:

> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sendrecvmsg
>
> The module ext/sockets, a wrapper around the sockets API, does not  
> include support to recvmsg() and sendmsg(). This RFC addresses this  
> shortcoming by support introducing limited (only a few types of messages  
> are supported) support for these functions.
>

Since no one has commented and the feature freeze for 5.5 is getting near,  
I'm just going to assume lazy consensus and merge this in once I get it to  
build on Windows.

So if you do have any objection (procedural or substantial), please raise  
it soon.

-- 
Gustavo Lopes

---

## #65499 — Brandon Wamboldt — 2013-01-30T12:54:04+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/65092#65499 · In reply to: #65496

Seeing as it doesn't break BC, and could be quite useful I don't see why
you shouldn't merge it.


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:23:59 +0100, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
> wrote:
>
>  https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**sendrecvmsg<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sendrecvmsg>
> > […]
> Since no one has commented and the feature freeze for 5.5 is getting near,
> I'm just going to assume lazy consensus and merge this in once I get it to
> build on Windows.
>
> So if you do have any objection (procedural or substantial), please raise
> it soon.
>
> --
> Gustavo Lopes
>
> --
> 
> 
>
>


-- 
*Brandon Wamboldt*
Software Engineer

Resume/CV <http://brandonwamboldt.com/cv/>  - Personal
Site/Blog<http://brandonwamboldt.ca/>
 - LinkedIn <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brandonwamboldt> - StackOverflow
Careers Profile <http://careers.stackoverflow.com/brandonwamboldt> - GitHub
Profile <https://github.com/brandonwamboldt

---

## #66085 — Ferenc Kovacs — 2013-02-21T03:06:42+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/65092#66085 · In reply to: #65092

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>wrote:

> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**sendrecvmsg<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sendrecvmsg>
>
> The module ext/sockets, a wrapper around the sockets API, does not include
> support to recvmsg() and sendmsg(). This RFC addresses this shortcoming by
> support introducing limited (only a few types of messages are supported)
> support for these functions.
>
> --
> Gustavo Lopes
>
> --
> 
> 
>
>
Hi Gustavo,

Could you update the status of the RFC and list it on
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ ?

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

---

## #66093 — Gustavo Lopes — 2013-02-21T08:23:23+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/65092#66093 · In reply to: #66085

Em 2013-02-21 4:06, Ferenc Kovacs escreveu:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Gustavo Lopes 
> <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>wrote:
>
> > […]
>
> Could you update the status of the RFC and list it on
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ ?

Done.

P.S.: Trim the quoted text -- at the every least, take the signature 
off.

-- 
Gustavo Lopes