# [REPOST] TSRM.c MFH Request

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/6483
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/6483
- Started by Michael Sisolak on 2003-12-16T19:51:46+00:00
- Messages: 4
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #6483 — Michael Sisolak — 2003-12-16T19:51:46+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/6483#6483

I know MFHing memory leaks isn't anywhere near as exciting as arguing
about the fine points of CSV file processing, but can someone with
enough karma please take a minute to look at my request?  Thanks.

> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:17:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: Michael Sisolak <msisolak@yahoo.com>
> Subject: TSRM.c MFH Request
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> 
> Can someone with proper karma please MFH the change in TSRM.c version
> 1.50 - it never made it back into the 4_3 branch.  It cleans up a
> memory leak of the mutexp variable under Win32 threading.  Thanks.
> 
> Michael Sisolak
> msisolak@yahoo.com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

---

## #6485 — Derick Rethans — 2003-12-16T20:00:21+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/6483#6485 · In reply to: #6483

> I know MFHing memory leaks isn't anywhere near as exciting as arguing
> about the fine points of CSV file processing, but can someone with
> enough karma please take a minute to look at my request?  Thanks.

Done, thanks for bringing this under our attention again.

Derick

---

## #6486 — Derick Rethans — 2003-12-16T20:09:40+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/6483#6486 · In reply to: #6484

> 
> > […]
>
> This was already done by Jani on Dec 15th.

That was something else...

Derick

---

## #6484 — Ilia Alshanetsky — 2003-12-16T20:11:45+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/6483#6484 · In reply to: #6483

> I know MFHing memory leaks isn't anywhere near as exciting as arguing
> about the fine points of CSV file processing, but can someone with
> enough karma please take a minute to look at my request?  Thanks.

This was already done by Jani on Dec 15th.

Ilia
