# [RFC] Property Accessors v1.1

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/63281
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/63281
- Started by Clint Priest on 2012-10-08T12:57:36+00:00
- Messages: 1
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #63281 — Clint Priest — 2012-10-08T12:57:36+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/63281#63281

Each time I've posted the RFC for review more has come up so I suppose at this point it needs to go through a waiting period on further comments and then in 2 weeks?   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Dragoonis [mailto:dragoonis@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 7:50 AM
> To: Clint Priest
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Propety Accessors v1.1
> 
> Good work Clint!
> 
> Performance is probably one of the things people will complain about so it's good that your benchmark is proving that it's merely
> identical to the old __get() approach.
> 
> What remains on your TODO list for this functionality?
> When are you planning to run an RFC vote on this?
> 
> I think this would be a valuable addition to PHP 5.5.
> 
> Cheers,
> Paul.
> 
> 
> > […]
> <.01s difference.  Depending on the run it is sometimes exactly the same performance.
> > […]
> the last time I posted about it.
> > […]
> proofed
> > […]