# BC Break in PHP 5.3.16 Reflection API

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/62420
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/62420
- Started by Benjamin Eberlei on 2012-08-23T12:47:40+00:00
- Messages: 4
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #62420 — Benjamin Eberlei — 2012-08-23T12:47:40+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/62420#62420

I get reports from Doctrine users, that apparently the Reflection API is
broken in 5.3.16 and everything else than BC:

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62715

Has been closed, but wrongly. Can this be opened up and handled? Or is a
follow up bug appropriate here?

---

## #62421 — Laruence — 2012-08-23T14:24:25+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/62420#62421 · In reply to: #62420

Hi:
   this bug has been fixed,  just because it has two commits,  thus
our RMs didn't pick them all to 5.3.16..

   so, I think it is no need to re-open it.

thanks


> I get reports from Doctrine users, that apparently the Reflection API is
> broken in 5.3.16 and everything else than BC:
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62715
>
> Has been closed, but wrongly. Can this be opened up and handled? Or is a
> follow up bug appropriate here?



-- 
Laruence  Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/

---

## #62446 — Pierre Joye — 2012-08-24T10:05:49+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/62420#62446 · In reply to: #62421

hi!


> Hi:
>    this bug has been fixed,  just because it has two commits,  thus
> our RMs didn't pick them all to 5.3.16..
>
>    so, I think it is no need to re-open it.
>
> thanks
>
> 
> > […]

Re-assigned to the 5.4 RM.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

---

## #62447 — Pierre Joye — 2012-08-24T10:06:39+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/62420#62447 · In reply to: #62421

hi!


> Hi:
>    this bug has been fixed,  just because it has two commits,  thus
> our RMs didn't pick them all to 5.3.16..
>
>    so, I think it is no need to re-open it.

I re assigned it to the 5.3 RM.

Thanks for the head up!

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org