# BUG #18630

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/5133
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/5133
- Started by Uwe Schindler on 2003-10-30T22:01:16+00:00
- Messages: 2
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #5133 — Uwe Schindler — 2003-10-30T22:01:16+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/5133#5133

You can also check vor availability of this single function with 
GetProcAddress(GetModuleHandle("kernel32.dll"),"funcname") and use the 
pointer from there if not NULL. If this is the only unknown function in 
Win95/NT4 then we should not boot out all people because of a single 
function. That construct would do the same.

At 21:48 30.10.2003, you wrote:
>At 09:10 PM 10/30/2003 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
> > […]
>
>
>Someone claimed that in the far east Win95 and NT 4 are still popular.
>I would like to have a discussion here and decide on this issue. We are 
>only talking about the support of our binary distribution. I think I can 
>make the source compatible using #ifdef.
>
>Andi
>
>--
>
>

-----
Uwe Schindler
thetaphi@php.net - http://www.php.net
NSAPI SAPI developer
Erlangen, Germany

---

## #5134 — Andi Gutmans — 2003-10-30T22:48:05+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/5133#5134 · In reply to: #5133

At 11:01 PM 10/30/2003 +0100, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>You can also check vor availability of this single function with 
>GetProcAddress(GetModuleHandle("kernel32.dll"),"funcname") and use the 
>pointer from there if not NULL. If this is the only unknown function in 
>Win95/NT4 then we should not boot out all people because of a single 
>function. That construct would do the same.

Yeah, I also thought of that but I don't really want to do run-time checks. 
It is a possibility though.

Andi