# beta1

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/42714
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/42714
- Started by Lukas Kahwe Smith on 2009-01-19T21:54:41+00:00
- Messages: 7
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #42714 — Lukas Kahwe Smith — 2009-01-19T21:54:41+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42714

Hi,

Given the on going discussions especially about Closures it seems  
pointless to move towards beta1 this week. Therefore we are delaying  
beta1 to Feb. 29th. This means we will be freezing for non build/ 
critical fixes next Monday. Packaging will be the following Wednesday.

In order to make this date, its imperative that the involved parties  
find a compromise by this Thursday and publish a summary on this day  
as well. The patch should follow ASAP, obviously no later than Monday  
next week. So please folks think in terms of getting 5.3 out the door  
and if necessary features should be moved out of 5.3 and worked on in  
HEAD.

I am also waiting on some word on the upgrading guide, Steph??? Maybe  
someone else can step up to help out here. Nathan should hopefully  
finally get the php.ini proposal to us. All other important issues  
seem to be under control and a few others have a few days to get in or  
not .. so it goes.

regards,
Johannes and Lukas

---

## #42715 — Lukas Kahwe Smith — 2009-01-19T21:59:27+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42715 · In reply to: #42714

> Hi,
>
> Given the on going discussions especially about Closures it seems  
> pointless to move towards beta1 this week. Therefore we are delaying  
> beta1 to Feb. 29th. This means we will be freezing for non build/ 
> critical fixes next Monday. Packaging will be the following Wednesday.

of course i meant January.

regards,
Lukas

---

## #42716 — Steph Fox — 2009-01-19T22:15:56+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42716 · In reply to: #42714

Hi Lukas,

> I am also waiting on some word on the upgrading guide, Steph??? 

Yes, I'm on it.

- Steph

---

## #42720 — Lester Caine — 2009-01-20T07:16:21+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42720 · In reply to: #42715

Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > […]
> 
> of course i meant January.

Sure? Next 29th Feb looks more practical ;)

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

---

## #42847 — Lukas Kahwe Smith — 2009-01-26T12:02:51+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42847 · In reply to: #42715

Hey,

Just FYI .. today is the last day for feature changes ahead of 5.3.0  
beta1. The big change I am waiting on for today is the removal of the  
OO specific features in closures. Tomorrow will be dedicated to build  
only fixes, Johannes/Pierre will then handle the packaging some time  
on Wednesday. They will notify the list once that is done and  
development may continue then.

Note however that we are then in beta state, which is more or less  
feature freeze time aka bug fixing only. Johannes and I reserve the  
right to start some finger slapping if people throw in features  
without previous nods from us. So bug fixing only please! Then we can  
hopefully follow up with beta2 or better yet already with RC1 in a  
reasonable amount of time.

regards,
Lukas

---

## #42851 — Stanislav Malyshev — 2009-01-26T17:30:21+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42851 · In reply to: #42847

Hi!

> Just FYI .. today is the last day for feature changes ahead of 5.3.0 
> beta1. The big change I am waiting on for today is the removal of the OO 
> specific features in closures. Tomorrow will be dedicated to build only 

What do you mean by "removal of OO specific features"? I thought we 
agreed on having closures just as they are now. Did anything change? Why?
-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
stas@zend.com   http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829   MSN: stas@zend.com

---

## #42853 — Lukas Kahwe Smith — 2009-01-26T21:36:23+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/42714#42853 · In reply to: #42851

> Hi!
>
> > […]
>
> What do you mean by "removal of OO specific features"? I thought we  
> agreed on having closures just as they are now. Did anything change?  
> Why?

Sorry for not communicating this earlier. Johannes and I are just  
worried that discussions over the OO aspects in closures will continue  
to slow down the 5.3 release process. In an effort to keep the focus  
on releasing all the features we do feel 100% comfortable with we have  
asked Christian to do this change. He agreed to this, even though he  
of course would rather have kept the OO features in, but he was none  
the less willing to do this for the greater good (as defined by the  
RMs). So in other words if you feel this is bad, blame the RMs .. but  
the decision still stands (I hope we RMs have enough credit to make  
such a decision).

regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls@pooteeweet.org
