# Patch for opcode caches - Thread: https://externals.io/message/36134 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/36134 - Started by Dmitry Stogov on 2008-03-14T08:46:41+00:00 - Messages: 9 - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #36134 — Dmitry Stogov — 2008-03-14T08:46:41+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36134 Hi Marcus, > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:helly@php.net] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:27 PM > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: Andi Gutmans; Stas Malyshev; phpxcache; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for opcode caches > > > Hello Dmitry, > > Monday, March 10, 2008, 1:48:05 PM, you wrote: > > > […] > > > […] > untested (see > > […] > > > […] > > Good, I am just worried that we introduce different behavior. > We should just have one execution mode. Your change is better > now having a more detailed view on what it does. But I think > we should not have the old model as well. Removing early-binding at all might be a subject for PHP6, however in PHP_5_3 we even keep ze1_compatibility_mode. I'm not able to remove it. [skiped] > > […] > > I did not see -e in the list of allowed flags. So it cannot work. Then I don't understand you last comments about the patch. Thanks. Dmitry. --- ## #36135 — Hannes Magnusson — 2008-03-14T10:06:42+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36135 · In reply to: #36134 > > Removing early-binding at all might be a subject for PHP6, however in > PHP_5_3 we even keep ze1_compatibility_mode. http://news.php.net/php.internals/36085 -Hannes --- ## #36136 — Pierre Joye — 2008-03-14T10:11:06+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36136 · In reply to: #36135 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > > […] > > http://news.php.net/php.internals/36085 I don't see any sane reason not to remove it :) -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org --- ## #36137 — Marcus Boerger — 2008-03-14T15:22:44+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36137 · In reply to: #36136 Hello Pierre, it is unused code that does not work as intended and causes trouble. And at leats it makes maintanance harder. So that is a very big reason to drop it. marcus Friday, March 14, 2008, 11:11:06 AM, you wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Hannes Magnusson > wrote: > > […] > I don't see any sane reason not to remove it :) > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org Best regards, Marcus --- ## #36138 — Derick Rethans — 2008-03-14T15:23:25+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36138 · In reply to: #36134 > however in > PHP_5_3 we even keep ze1_compatibility_mode. > I'm not able to remove it. WHy not? It's quite broken anyway. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org --- ## #36139 — Marcus Boerger — 2008-03-14T15:24:56+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36139 · In reply to: #36134 Hello Dmitry, Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:46:41 AM, you wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > […] > Removing early-binding at all might be a subject for PHP6, however in > PHP_5_3 we even keep ze1_compatibility_mode. > I'm not able to remove it. I do not want to remove early binding. In fact I always wanted to have early binding as much as possible. Because that is faster and makes compiler caches easier. So why slow down stuff? A Compiler cache wants everythign as static as possible which means a compiler cache wants early binding. This is also faster. So what are you proposing here? Best regards, Marcus --- ## #36140 — Pierre Joye — 2008-03-14T15:42:32+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36140 · In reply to: #36137 > Hello Pierre, > > it is unused code that does not work as intended and causes trouble. And > at leats it makes maintanance harder. So that is a very big reason to drop > it. Yes, I fully agree (you may have missed the "not" in my reply :-) Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org --- ## #36145 — Marcus Boerger — 2008-03-14T17:24:15+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36145 · In reply to: #36140 Hello Pierre, yep, stupid me. I got confused by your wording :-) marcus Friday, March 14, 2008, 4:42:32 PM, you wrote: > > > […] > Yes, I fully agree (you may have missed the "not" in my reply :-) > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org Best regards, Marcus --- ## #36167 — Ilia Alshanetsky — 2008-03-17T12:20:53+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/36134#36167 · In reply to: #36138 Keeping it seems fairly meaningless (it was a temporary hack anyway). Since 5.1 (or possibly even late 5.0) releases much of the new functionality ignores it anyway. > > > > […] > > WHy not? It's quite broken anyway. > > Derick > > -- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org > > -- > > > Ilia Alshanetsky