# PATCH: Implementing closures in PHP - Thread: https://externals.io/message/34272 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/34272 - Started by Ryusuke SEKIYAMA on 2007-12-28T16:45:03+00:00 - Messages: 6 - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #34272 — Ryusuke SEKIYAMA — 2007-12-28T16:45:03+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34272 >any idea about the possibility of hash conflict? How about this patch? http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-071228a.patch This patch is PHP 5.3 version of the patch I have introduced in my blog. (written in Japanese) 1. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071126/1196077860 2. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071128/1196260732 3. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071130/1196426672 This patch contains two features, anonymous function and square bracket array syntax. Anonymous function can be used in loop (does not exhaust memory as create_function() in loop), work with opcode caches and also can be called directly like JavaScript's one. For example: % php -r 'print_r(array_map(function($n){ return $n * $n; }, [1, 2, 3]));' Array ( [0] => 1 [1] => 4 [2] => 9 ) % php -r 'function($str){ echo $str, "\n"; }("foo");' foo More examples are included in this archive: http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-071228-anon-patch.zip -- /** * Ryusuke SEKIYAMA * rsky0711@gmail.com */ --- ## #34277 — Xuefer — 2007-12-30T09:45:45+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34277 · In reply to: #34272 > > […] > > How about this patch? > http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-071228a.patch yeah build_runtime_defined_function_key! that's what i thought of :) and i hope the function name cv works as expected so no `hash()` on the looong name is needed at run time, and assume that modern cpu will do long memcmp/strcmp quick enough --- ## #34305 — Marcus Boerger — 2007-12-30T18:09:49+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34305 · In reply to: #34272 Hello Ryusuke, generally I like both. But could you provide separate patches? marcus Friday, December 28, 2007, 5:45:03 PM, you wrote: > > […] > How about this patch? > http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-071228a.patch > This patch is PHP 5.3 version of the patch I have introduced > in my blog. (written in Japanese) > 1. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071126/1196077860 > 2. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071128/1196260732 > 3. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rsky/20071130/1196426672 > This patch contains two features, anonymous function and > square bracket array syntax. > Anonymous function can be used in loop (does not exhaust memory > as create_function() in loop), work with opcode caches > and also can be called directly like JavaScript's one. > For example: > % php -r 'print_r(array_map(function($n){ return $n * $n; }, [1, 2, 3]));' > Array > ( > [0] => 1 > [1] => 4 > [2] => 9 > ) > % php -r 'function($str){ echo $str, "\n"; }("foo");' > foo > More examples are included in this archive: > http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-071228-anon-patch.zip > -- > /** > * Ryusuke SEKIYAMA > * rsky0711@gmail.com > */ Best regards, Marcus --- ## #34318 — Ryusuke SEKIYAMA — 2008-01-02T05:49:26+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34318 · In reply to: #34305 Hi, Marcus. 2007/12/31, Marcus Boerger : > Hello Ryusuke, > > generally I like both. But could you provide separate patches? Yes, I can. Here is the anonymous function patch for PHP 5.3, http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080101-anon.patch the square bracket array syntax patch for PHP 5.3, http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080101-sbar.patch and the anonymous function patch for PHP 6.0. http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-6.0dev-080101-anon.patch Regards. -- /** * Ryusuke SEKIYAMA * rsky0711@gmail.com */ --- ## #34319 — Stanislav Malyshev — 2008-01-02T18:51:06+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34319 · In reply to: #34318 > the square bracket array syntax patch for PHP 5.3, > http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080101-sbar.patch I remember we discussed that already and it was rejected then (even though myself and Andi liked it) - did the people that objected then change their minds? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com --- ## #34527 — Marcus Boerger — 2008-01-06T14:17:48+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/34272#34527 · In reply to: #34319 Hello Stanislav, tha makesw three then already, how about we ask around again? Ryusuke, can you please start a new '[RFC] Square brackets shortcut' thread to collect opinions and pass along the patch for that? I like the anonymous function patch too. It is clean and simple. Maybe you want to start a second '[RFC] Anonymous functions' thread with that patch. Can you also please add tests for both? marcus Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 7:51:06 PM, you wrote: > > […] > I remember we discussed that already and it was rejected then (even > though myself and Andi liked it) - did the people that objected then > change their minds? Best regards, Marcus