# PTS support patch

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/16294
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/16294
- Started by Michael Spector on 2005-05-25T09:51:57+00:00
- Messages: 5
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #16294 — Michael Spector — 2005-05-25T09:51:57+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/16294#16294

Here's a patch for PTS support in proc_open, instead of having PHP_CAN_DO_PTS always
disabled this patch introduces --enable-pty option.
Added support for BSD4 PTS types.
Please review it.

-- 
Best regards,

Michael

---

## #16307 — Michael Spector — 2005-05-29T21:08:24+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/16294#16307 · In reply to: #16294

> Here's a patch for PTS support in proc_open, instead of having PHP_CAN_DO_PTS always
> disabled this patch introduces --enable-pty option.
> Added support for BSD4 PTS types.
> Please review it.
> 

Anybody has any objections to including this patch?

-- 
Best regards,

Michael

---

## #16308 — Wez Furlong — 2005-05-30T00:45:56+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/16294#16308 · In reply to: #16307

None from me.

Would be cool if we could automagically detect support during
configure time, but due to the lack of any kind of positive feedback
to my last efforts, I won't be the person doing it.

--Wez.


> 
> > […]
> 
> Anybody has any objections to including this patch?
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> 
> Michael

---

## #16309 — magnus@php.net — 2005-05-30T01:15:15+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/16294#16309 · In reply to: #16307

> 
> > […]
>
> Anybody has any objections to including this patch?

+1
I need it myself too..

Magnus

-- 
   The only skills I have the patience to learn are those that have no 
real application in life.  -- Calvin

---

## #16343 — Jani Taskinen — 2005-05-31T07:51:01+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/16294#16343 · In reply to: #16308

Sascha pretty well explained why adding such automagic is not
     possible. But maybe if there is some small test prog to try with
     AC_TRY_RUN(), I can always add that. (but I lack the knowledge on how
     to write such prog..)

     --Jani




> None from me.
>
> Would be cool if we could automagically detect support during
> configure time, but due to the lack of any kind of positive feedback
> to my last efforts, I won't be the person doing it.
>
> --Wez.
>
> 
> > […]