# [RFC][VOTE] mb_str_split - Thread: https://externals.io/message/103684 - Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/103684 - Started by Legale Legage on 2019-01-05T21:03:08+00:00 - Messages: 7 - RFC: mb_str_split() Split multibyte string (Implemented (PHP 7.4)) — https://externals.io/rfc/mb_str_split.md - Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net - More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · RFCs at https://externals.io/rfc.md · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt --- ## #103684 — Legale Legage — 2019-01-05T21:03:08+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103684 Hello, internals. All received suggestions and comments have been settled. Please vote. http://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split --- ## #103685 — Legale Legage — 2019-01-05T21:11:44+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103685 · In reply to: #103684 Fixed URL: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split > Hello, internals. > All received suggestions and comments have been settled. Please vote. > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split --- ## #103686 — Lester Caine — 2019-01-05T21:31:16+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103686 · In reply to: #103685 > Fixed URL:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split It would be useful if the rfc actually included the outline of just what the function is proposing to provide? A start at least at documentation for inclusion in the manual later, but allowing an understanding of just how the chunks are defined. mb characters or bytes for example? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - https://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - https://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - https://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - https://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - https://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk --- ## #103687 — Christoph M. Becker — 2019-01-05T23:48:17+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103687 · In reply to: #103684 > Hello, internals. > All received suggestions and comments have been settled. Please vote. > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split Thanks for your first RFC! :) It seems that you have not opened the voting (search for “doodle” in the RFC-howto[1]) yet, but you are supposed to start voting only after at least two weeks have passed since you presented an RFC on this mailing list (also described in the RFC-Howto), which happened on Jan, 2nd. I suggest to change the status of the RFC back to discussion for now, and to (re-)start the vote later. [1] > > > […] > > It would be useful if the rfc actually included the outline of just what > the function is proposing to provide? A start at least at documentation > for inclusion in the manual later, but allowing an understanding of just > how the chunks are defined. mb characters or bytes for example? To my knowledge, `mb_str_split()` is supposed to be the MBString pendant of `str_split()`, which works on code-points instead of bytes. -- Christoph M. Becker --- ## #103689 — Legale Legage — 2019-01-06T12:19:49+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103689 · In reply to: #103687 Moved back to "Under discussion" stage till 01-10-2019. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mb_str_split > > > > […] > > Thanks for your first RFC! :) > > It seems that you have not opened the voting (search for “doodle” in the > RFC-howto[1]) yet, but you are supposed to start voting only after at > least two weeks have passed since you presented an RFC on this mailing > list (also described in the RFC-Howto), which happened on Jan, 2nd. > > I suggest to change the status of the RFC back to discussion for now, > and to (re-)start the vote later. > > [1] > -- > Christoph M. Becker --- ## #103690 — Rowan Collins — 2019-01-06T14:35:06+00:00 URL: https://externals.io/message/103684#103690 · In reply to: #103689 >Moved back to "Under discussion" stage till 01-10-2019. I know it sounds pedantic, but be careful with date formats - I was scratching my head for some time, wondering what was special about October, or a 9 month delay, until I realised you probably meant Jan 10th not Oct 1st! Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]