Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99911 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77009 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2017 18:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2017 18:56:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rhsoft.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rhsoft.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain rhsoft.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rhsoft.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:22463] helo=mail.thelounge.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 74/6D-02884-AF95E695 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:56:59 -0400 Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3xBqC954lczXMT for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 20:56:53 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <64.32.02884.7983D695@pb1.pair.com> <86.8B.02884.8D93E695@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <387c1b9c-f738-5b28-0ed1-31b80d8bffb8@rhsoft.net> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 20:56:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-CH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] http_cookie_set and http_cookie_remove From: lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net") Am 18.07.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Michael Morris: > Personally, I no longer directly use these calls, preferring instead to use > Symfony's HTTP foundation classes. Those in turn are, I understand, in the > process of being converted to implement the common interface outlined here: > http://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-7/ I would be much more interested in > seeing a bare bones implementation of that agreed on standard in the > language core then seeing something entirely new, especially a band aid > solution but why do you do this? looks like these days everybody is using fat frameworks for anything like in JavaScript most people think Jquery *is* JavaScript i must have done something right starting my own cms/framework development in 2003 where a typical request takes 0.0015 to 0.0025 seconds on a 7 years old desktop machine without *any* 3rd party code and where you can simply count the function calls of a core system until large modules come into play hence a guest hosting some hundret instances shows 100-500 Mhz on the vCenter server and literally you can push out at best 50% of the requests the machine could ansser to a internet connection because of the additional latencys