Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99771 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73842 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2017 17:21:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jul 2017 17:21:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@fleshgrinder.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@fleshgrinder.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 212.232.25.164 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@fleshgrinder.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.232.25.164 mx208.easyname.com Received: from [212.232.25.164] ([212.232.25.164:36951] helo=mx208.easyname.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 06/20-15131-3002D595 for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:21:10 -0400 Received: from cable-81-173-135-96.netcologne.de ([81.173.135.96] helo=[192.168.178.20]) by mx.easyname.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dSnz3-0005KX-6h; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:21:02 +0000 References: <007b6d6e-76c6-56af-e072-872f933eb387@fleshgrinder.com> To: cmbecker69@gmx.de, php-internals Message-ID: <6502a35c-43c8-35e0-a0fc-57c0fb14a9e8@fleshgrinder.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:20:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TslpM3skQA0XuWVIt2918Ikj6gGRGML7t" X-DNSBL-PBLSPAMHAUS: YES Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Voting] Class Naming From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder) --TslpM3skQA0XuWVIt2918Ikj6gGRGML7t Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Rd6msM9eCAhMM1iheIPVEHtf0W1WkCN9W"; protected-headers="v1" From: Fleshgrinder To: cmbecker69@gmx.de, php-internals Message-ID: <6502a35c-43c8-35e0-a0fc-57c0fb14a9e8@fleshgrinder.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Voting] Class Naming References: <007b6d6e-76c6-56af-e072-872f933eb387@fleshgrinder.com> In-Reply-To: --Rd6msM9eCAhMM1iheIPVEHtf0W1WkCN9W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/4/2017 11:24 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > Hmm, one might dislike having the coding standards amended in this > regard, but still may have a preference on how it would be changed, if > the change will be accepted. >=20 Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense. What I want to avoid is that anybody thinks that the second poll has any meaning if the first one is a "no". In that case the second one is "nothing". That is basically the point. A vote like you said definitely makes sense, yes. --=20 Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger --Rd6msM9eCAhMM1iheIPVEHtf0W1WkCN9W-- --TslpM3skQA0XuWVIt2918Ikj6gGRGML7t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZXR/6AAoJEOKkKcqFPVVrntkQALWDueMKeOxYxKQdMX25DZbK 8TUIvQaIuGl+Cnuae/Tckmb1p8NuAXHlEdXFx3f7WU/+qniJeosiEeQ0xLGyip+I 7qTi3JEY88AEV7T/V8+8JIZN3GI996wRid54v1GDzaW7zK4kCtmq+0qdko/DpPci 9Q5/Oh6AETETAPa+78lNL4OZwToChXyb20YL54hWE2E+BQrh5UcDP/2cdFJnXtNv dWzwjtY2s8BKit+SYtEVLxIa8QvOh/yEM152G0t+NZH6VZAUFlJOjeV8jAMx04vV Bt50twCUj0eOXXIvu2fhALsFFBllEpzm+OP4r/eb5YaRr5XsRfw/2sNzKrBC6giq Pda2nO5bkEJdtRspZyxswYZiiWhhu3innXjGyll1qD7Avy/xft1QArpK6Ypz2eu4 ham7C+UizpFOTxApTxFMp+0hAZc8lhNjbWW4D1VxlQX1xwuPDQg5xdPXOtjuhZ/7 30mvxCoN9ghR1HokoyJMtP56l1+SroNSmqXAu0iyxDVTmjt5EK2Wn/SFkmp9SRgP MHj/I4uGCQxuZLgDRUur4NeGSPTQnrcdqT02CbFpCR911Y2dcLOdi3KScEzVAdKv BTlIe/bqJLo66mM4JMc1BjcZv5yayqI9wE+wES6q02DgffhTsi9lgtEf75Tx2QMK c2neDIH+cETGnsrBlSC1 =+IPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TslpM3skQA0XuWVIt2918Ikj6gGRGML7t--