Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99613 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84288 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2017 13:32:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jun 2017 13:32:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.4 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.4 smtp4-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.4] ([212.27.42.4:12054] helo=smtp4-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/F3-52620-3E6CB495 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:32:20 -0400 Received: from [172.16.0.26] (unknown [158.255.108.131]) (Authenticated sender: flaupretre@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9126D19F5CF; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:32:13 +0200 (CEST) To: Dmitry Stogov , Internals References: <1e99c642-e3b8-3445-82ac-f6cb6258e0b4@php.net> <4ef58012-ad0d-4a7b-c558-159a670d2d40@tekwire.net> Message-ID: <19bcbfa1-4681-578d-2b8e-03e8a923c83f@tekwire.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:32:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------40F0FF10B96E134B7FB4E342" Content-Language: fr Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Add support for stream-wrapped URLs in opcode cache From: francois@tekwire.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Laupretre?=) --------------40F0FF10B96E134B7FB4E342 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Dmitry, Le 22/06/2017 à 09:42, Dmitry Stogov a écrit : > The PR is incomplete, so I can't test and even understand the idea > completely. > > In my opinion, user defined streams can't be cached, because the > wrapper code itself may be changed from request to request. > Right. I hadn't imagined the case where two different applications would use a common wrapper name. So, we should probably restrict the feature to permanent (C code) wrappers. Regards François --------------40F0FF10B96E134B7FB4E342--