Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99576
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain mindplay.dk from 209.85.192.182 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <64e7de96-6a46-1c2c-5492-fab5a0f22b32@fischer.name>
References: <CAFMT4Npoo_ZrRk-kk4C6KHYEtV93pU7Wmh0FhaPi6Z-9qkObaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVpQtLXhKnUn2EE4s7rZn11r5Kpj2zOSOKRCWFaxaeOrjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b1105f90-91e9-e61a-b96b-5078c337ab5c@telia.com> <b47c4379-109c-c289-1077-b42ea40fe19f@telia.com>
 <ca6f11d0-5da3-757c-7acd-4acd79a876f1@fleshgrinder.com> <5fe1eefe-1c4f-4c31-c975-ab6c768c977c@telia.com>
 <E56D1F4A-6DC7-47DA-BAD6-1722E017B048@me.com> <CADqTB_jDmFZZc3ah=J8F99P77qnuWVgXS5UwXgrbartCp5B+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <3C763609-54FC-480B-AE95-94A1873226E0@me.com> <CADqTB_hU+38TOHdaukhGBS-2NPq-PNSci1h078TPOGbE7WcmWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9A3447BF-F982-4C5A-B55B-466036AF2E53@me.com> <CAFMT4NrdCRJxGyeGqLbAoaV896FN6VpDjY-68trXoaRgZe4VyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADqTB_hT-Nd5wX129GgeQxL8RNJ85maSPOPHUt-2NK-ef3yF-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADqTB_hB1ifmXu4VO6Z4A3gN=2AF_PU4C8yCYXz8QN6zZ_k=6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <2d89daaa-056f-3dcb-a5f2-b790affe203a@garfieldtech.com> <CADqTB_gN+bdU9HBbyjpJJCK7FxO_rQi9hmEuhANGEkc52mpHtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <64e7de96-6a46-1c2c-5492-fab5a0f22b32@fischer.name>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:49:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CADqTB_gtTqhhijK3xoQ74N7wWpMZzQfmQ_eVNFR3pbKi+iBdWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e23b4f791e405526708bb"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions
From: rasmus@mindplay.dk (Rasmus Schultz)

--f403045e23b4f791e405526708bb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> I just think your example is an exaggeration to what happens in practice.

I think it's an example of what happens with any inconsistent feature in
any language.


On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name> wrote:

> Hello Rasmus,
>
> On 19.06.17 22:22, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>
>> If I have to factor back and forth between new and old syntax every time a
>> closure changes from one to multiple or back to one statement, then,
>> frankly, what's the point?
>>
>> I think I would just keep using the old syntax, then - for consistency,
>> and
>> to save myself the frustration of factoring back and forth.
>>
>
> I'm writing closures every day and it's so rare to have this changes from
> single/multiple I don't even remember. I think in practice this is a
> non-issue except for very rare special cases and, don't forget: it's
> optional, you don't have to.
>
> In my opinion, if this is worth doing, it's worth doing it right.
>>
>
> No counter-argument here :)
>
> I just think your example is an exaggeration to what happens in practice.
>
> - Markus
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--f403045e23b4f791e405526708bb--