Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99527
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 77.244.243.86 cause and error)
References: <2ad04b8f-76e5-4420-2776-5bda28f60285@fedoraproject.org>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <9993100f-f925-d6e1-67ed-b109bc00c8d9@fleshgrinder.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:35:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2ad04b8f-76e5-4420-2776-5bda28f60285@fedoraproject.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="CG78G50mC7HxVNtm06LofMHxE9d0pkeJs"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License
From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder)

--CG78G50mC7HxVNtm06LofMHxE9d0pkeJs
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VCHMaTDBCT14IPI8Ge7gl2QK9uqjB38b1";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <9993100f-f925-d6e1-67ed-b109bc00c8d9@fleshgrinder.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License
References: <2ad04b8f-76e5-4420-2776-5bda28f60285@fedoraproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <2ad04b8f-76e5-4420-2776-5bda28f60285@fedoraproject.org>

--VCHMaTDBCT14IPI8Ge7gl2QK9uqjB38b1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 6/13/2017 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed
> (libs may, of course, have different license)
>=20
> Is there any strong rule about this ?
> Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extension ?
>=20
> Context: see sodium PR
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2560
>=20
>=20
> IMHO, make sense to have only PHP Licensed ext.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Remi
>=20

We also include GNU stuff:

https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/6053987bc27e8dede37f437193a5cad448f99=
bce/ext/mbstring/libmbfl/LICENSE

I cannot tell what implications this has, and do not want to make any
judgment regarding this issue.

--=20
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger


--VCHMaTDBCT14IPI8Ge7gl2QK9uqjB38b1--

--CG78G50mC7HxVNtm06LofMHxE9d0pkeJs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZQn8eAAoJEOKkKcqFPVVrg4UQAKc0MqupSG7pS/eYrgUzaFPM
re3moL/Ggzyzt6LgfDwwMT/uaMHAwIVUi05TalVWip9DdCkdroNjQErkYSxAM6xI
6knY5L+ZCX4te75w7AWuleyGQpGS2NikTHd6d5tDvyb/oKNX5SrGJhfFYOd0XMRw
HIuPOD0eVxOzms6fIlOgMQBLxP3NUBol8hgydWIchVZoPeZPHLFUZDEA3khai4Ig
c6gwo52KT6FO+i/Jfl8fA74NU3hHWjnhc8PpSvqYeqnrjgfP/9V41lMGumPc81/e
NpwBxlKglg2T+fXLuO/GtKg98aqwPeAMjpfJprSPNcNDvFOmgoQX0rxjn9t+kBHH
d3Y3xjRKSxtSEE2dAHZlCF5XK8ZfaYOodsMD951k21oNKv4K9s2oNXtQ9RrRYzRg
155+6ppdBJNs5dVvbGFcg/oMRkJNT57+nIZdyso1o6Fxa/GLDD10kJg37/Fcj1Gz
f/jqVK3zZqsbdn2FC8EBWxgJK2ojP6XoHSOFHCZKqWYkv3JQYRL1aF9r8Ts9lpR2
7CgPG0mhKWJaj5uBP/oq3JGbnxd4C1Y8tU9c59BKyomm2T/au2Tp48MN5WHNH3cG
YgYLDWH8cFjQzOe9ElMzlW1qDNwt5pGgyJzsW5HVEf9BlX1s8bpfm95Y/br7DPq9
qRf0T1NEzfhpZlmmUCBy
=YFBO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CG78G50mC7HxVNtm06LofMHxE9d0pkeJs--