Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99495 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56169 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2017 06:14:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2017 06:14:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@daveyshafik.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@daveyshafik.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain daveyshafik.com from 209.85.216.181 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@daveyshafik.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.181 mail-qt0-f181.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.181] ([209.85.216.181:34838] helo=mail-qt0-f181.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 56/90-34001-D413E395 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:14:40 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w1so114677506qtg.2 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:14:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daveyshafik-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=VqqweKLC37qaEz7ks/QSqhqTApV7CM3RkZ3mobfwZxo=; b=ZrMVmXdI/OX/YSZfZ2ocy+Zx1iEih6ojfm6i8yvekPYAgxbStaZ4U7TW6/te/mr+4G VxDKSzhr3qY7Oka2k+EQz/ZS1vQPirW3Ixj0J/VbPO8MQ+aAk+DlN6+MO/Pd9H+83x5Y mO+18Tk4GwJeZOAXnZF1BcBG1GdTkSDd13lQD1YLDN2MSrJ3pLwAj18HG1+IpAWbO0ch Ji5LxdW5FD+bNwV/MahybZ0rIRbH2oUBqXkqOVTPgRuixDUYjEb4VRcIMZ3kecuBI3+9 LUUF/QfTXwAS4CiO4U0NTEz6QTP36vvA+59QNmfk0DRuj2DlL1Z+11a8jT0ap5v177S5 WWjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VqqweKLC37qaEz7ks/QSqhqTApV7CM3RkZ3mobfwZxo=; b=lOefKyvKX8cxbK9BfouBWtvVCxSEpmbuuuy2+xRg5BUuvKv+IZ5OPQDcR/ByhZIl7x J++HTpEf1uPnz4pA3rykJbp9e+9NYNOnv1VXx4qFfeZww0slzeIYCKfm0qq+Pg3gOeUE k8S7DT2hNvz4KK9OYAPFD7M5xzzQSXyp2j2GoeI4LqyufVN8PJtcpEvfqicgL4IRnuEe wjGQhuYP9bDayD/VR2f7O7YS9BOOF6R+x17bhfY9vAaNGn/cdTx+Q2dC6xiyhCL2q/zY WTD2OApJtvqByq2e2KP02M9P/C2rn2Fnhp8Ql1xxG0xAtO6ycxAN/bfWN/hh5bmGW4Uy fE0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBYNF1mPqa/sA2xH6B9drDzL35vPi9KhI5REbgTTFIRPyohOSSr t8eqi3qaZGhnKsiAapGmb8IEes0p7O2w X-Received: by 10.55.103.207 with SMTP id b198mr59519933qkc.55.1497248075348; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:14:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: me@daveyshafik.com Received: by 10.237.53.122 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:14:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7028fcfd-d47f-c983-510d-eefe4a36cd4a@tekwire.net> <4b3a548c-fd9f-42da-93c7-e8403f065da5@php.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:14:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 29QDfBdUR9MR0sf1kO4eYwUh7Dc Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=C3=A3es?= Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= , "Christoph M. Becker" , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c059b48ac169d0551bd3b0f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index From: davey@php.net (Davey Shafik) --94eb2c059b48ac169d0551bd3b0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pedro, It would be best to just kill the vote and start over. The proposal should be for deprecation notice in 7.2 and implementation in 8.0 IMO =E2=80=94 it= should be one vote, as doing both together should be the only option. - Davey On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Pedro Magalh=C3=A3es wro= te: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre > wrote: > > > > I am sorry you take it this way. Voting today on a feature for 8.0 > > wouldn't be ridiculous and it would make me change my vote, as most > others. > > Instead of nonsense, it would be a sign of maturity for the PHP project= . > It > > would be great, IMO, to open a 'Approved for 8.0' section on the RFC pa= ge > > now, and your RFC could proudly be the 1st one to enter it. > > > > I agree with your suggestion and general sentiment so I propose to do the > following: > > - The current voting widget refers to introducing the change on 7.2. > (Will be mentioned on the RFC page) > - Add a new voting widget for introducing the change on 8.0. > - Extend the voting period for one more week than originally planned > until 27/6/2017 18:00 UTC. > > Additionally, since some people also mentioned the difficulty in detectin= g > this change, if the vote for 8.0 passes, I suggest to introduce a > E_DEPRECATED notice where the implicit keys will change. You can see that > implementation here: > https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...pmmaga: > negative-array-deprecated > Would it make sense to include an extra voting widget for the introductio= n > of the notice? > > Given that we are on the voting phase I would oppose changing anything by > principle, but given that most of the discussion on the topic only starte= d > when the vote was started and what is dividing the vote is the timing, I > think it makes sense to update the RFC in this case. Let me know what you > think. > > Thanks, > Pedro > --94eb2c059b48ac169d0551bd3b0f--