Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99477
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 77.244.243.82 cause and error)
References: <990f6d85-e3ed-05a4-42e0-d3a279c0ebe7@fleshgrinder.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <277f53cd-0e79-6fcc-fa4b-b0527ca525b6@fleshgrinder.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:11:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <990f6d85-e3ed-05a4-42e0-d3a279c0ebe7@fleshgrinder.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="iSn6a0EDeNpfFQLN24ttJkAVGhIg5pFVW"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Namespaces in Core
From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder)

--iSn6a0EDeNpfFQLN24ttJkAVGhIg5pFVW
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TArS4hMnPTBjKOFhnI5tGdHVo3TlM10nT";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <277f53cd-0e79-6fcc-fa4b-b0527ca525b6@fleshgrinder.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Namespaces in Core
References: <990f6d85-e3ed-05a4-42e0-d3a279c0ebe7@fleshgrinder.com>
In-Reply-To: <990f6d85-e3ed-05a4-42e0-d3a279c0ebe7@fleshgrinder.com>

--TArS4hMnPTBjKOFhnI5tGdHVo3TlM10nT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 6/3/2017 6:40 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> Next promised RFC (and the last one for this weekend):
>=20
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces-in-core
>=20
> I am unsure about whether we should avoid the usage of abbreviations fo=
r
> things like language (lang), standard (std), and utility (util). I thin=
k
> it is not necessary to write them out fully, but, well, ...?!?
>=20

Bump, would love some feedback on the RFC and the open issues. Otherwise
this goes into voting and lots of complains pop up. It would be much
more efficient to use the discussion time for that.

--=20
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger


--TArS4hMnPTBjKOFhnI5tGdHVo3TlM10nT--

--iSn6a0EDeNpfFQLN24ttJkAVGhIg5pFVW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Pua6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iSn6a0EDeNpfFQLN24ttJkAVGhIg5pFVW--