Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99438
Return-Path: <mail@pmmaga.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 75380 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2017 18:24:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jun 2017 18:24:14 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mail@pmmaga.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mail@pmmaga.net; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pmmaga.net designates 149.210.149.72 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mail@pmmaga.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 149.210.149.72 outbound1.mail.transip.nl
Received: from [149.210.149.72] ([149.210.149.72:55532] helo=outbound1.mail.transip.nl)
by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
id 29/E7-27119-DC448395 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:24:14 -0400
Received: from submission5.mail.transip.nl (submission5.mail.transip.nl [149.210.149.125])
by outbound1.mail.transip.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wjcQL08Dbzfbm4
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:24:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (mail-wr0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171])
by submission5.mail.transip.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3wjcQH6vhKz7vZ6
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:24:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q97so9585390wrb.2
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDso27Cz2JvEb30z5iGqUZcGe6ApTprNRgrD8at/4Yg1aWNhbeE
cJVMD2gehNUAF5xaZ32RGk5xriEODQ==
X-Received: by 10.223.141.247 with SMTP id o110mr26165593wrb.69.1496859847052;
Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.64.213 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7028fcfd-d47f-c983-510d-eefe4a36cd4a@tekwire.net>
References: <CAJd4=YaMDkocahDE0muQNPYW=vgR_nffJD-CBKic7CnbFPwyyw@mail.gmail.com>
<eadc5bea-3412-9c9b-faa9-e74b442a6b84@gmx.de> <7028fcfd-d47f-c983-510d-eefe4a36cd4a@tekwire.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:23:46 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJd4=YadTb6wspVz7zAVh0wuasZdtCsjMnnER40y_ib3A5QVbw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJd4=YadTb6wspVz7zAVh0wuasZdtCsjMnnER40y_ib3A5QVbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= <francois@tekwire.net>
Cc: "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d60a8765a5f055162d739"
X-Scanned-By: ClueGetter at submission5.mail.transip.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
s=transip-a; d=pmmaga.net; t=1496859848; h=from:reply-to:subject:to:
cc:references:in-reply-to:date:mime-version:content-type;
bh=JRzh5AgezrhaNfTdJygqxIU683UFXZKgg4kjLTu1pRM=;
b=BOyhU7XbqiVncZrFVjljgC0zawo1+Kh5d6OGj8GkQysNtgyqQiwRDd4Rdn6qhYJ1UpyO9H
l5z9adgWJC2XYV/CRI/6lGeUe8pM14GN5Ad5FucfZDCgU5XluYzhl6obonSTLOTr5HFdYr
CtpYlEoIHIjQmL9U3ZTOV/GRloKzd/DowtgAAbsbF2CB56sdtDXJPufi51cVisHgVHSaTw
TEar4KSP3XY1mMnloV2D8et1P6r4YUveSfBlkTCeOOLHmELYIg1gTllPYD8ENe9LjyzmvU
jnFQxTE+wsuftjG3duymPKFwDlywx66ge4xiCtM++/ernnZ5WqAxeoRQz0W3wA==
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@transip.nl
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index
From: mail@pmmaga.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=C3=A3es?=)
--f403045d60a8765a5f055162d739
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre <francois@tekwire.n=
et>
wrote:
>
> So, I respectfully ask you to change target to PHP 8 or explain why we
> should make an exception to the process. Reasons you gave so far are OK f=
or
> a major version, but not for a minor one. This is not against you or your
> work, as I'd also like to change such inconsistent behavior, but the
> probability of BC break is too high, IMO.
>
I will not change the target version now during the voting phase. Also
because it wouldn't make sense to vote for a feature for 8.0 yet. If the
RFC is rejected and the sentiment is that most people would agree with the
change but not with the timing, I will propose it again when RFCs for 8.0
are relevant.
Thanks,
Pedro
--f403045d60a8765a5f055162d739--