Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99431 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17836 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2017 14:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jun 2017 14:22:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=aaron@trowski.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=aaron@trowski.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain trowski.com designates 199.38.81.6 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: aaron@trowski.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 199.38.81.6 mercury.negativeion.net Received: from [199.38.81.6] ([199.38.81.6:60597] helo=mercury.negativeion.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A9/CC-27119-24C08395 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 10:22:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.negativeion.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880364CEAA30 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:22:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at negativeion.net Received: from mercury.negativeion.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.negativeion.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57vSnpD_r9ne for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:22:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (unknown [173.225.159.140]) by mercury.negativeion.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E42B4CEAA21 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:22:56 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\)) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:22:56 -0500 References: To: internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5B8DF696-8854-4CB5-9F66-ADA23BDA3344@trowski.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index From: aaron@trowski.com (Aaron Piotrowski) > On Jun 7, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: >=20 > I voted no because of the BC break. >=20 Changed my vote to no for the same reason. The subtly of the BC would = make bugs potentially difficult to discern. Would happily vote yes again = for an RFC targeting 8. Aaron Piotrowski=