Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99420 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90916 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2017 12:18:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jun 2017 12:18:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.20 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.20] ([212.227.17.20:64299] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FA/88-27119-C2FE7395 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 08:18:53 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([79.243.116.67]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWQSM-1dOX171laE-00XeLr; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:18:43 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=c3=a3es?= , PHP internals References: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:19:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:abCxo0JzldEgFU1JxWffvufiLghvsE4Y2OA7oVDQSWcQ2I9nCDA 2qpiMA1zoj9QjsYXbsBNaabRDD+6HgcGHRkLbf58CxZnOGqYPmt4J96hTEL+WMA4PzXnO02 ucWmO4ZMe8CPyOFxhRjTWsxd/4Es4ODl7dfRJSVroLinYs0eROTFpGAZAuxqEU3wucjJ5xc MseaGCwq+0ONlGERyrvyA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gwF8pB1C6t0=:xir9WNdOHRQUX23qPXNoqE tAlvPexynGG/8qumAtvxWhFmlSKeSZKLYqTALdCqI5GgZv18Tjp4hYckCmhUIdPBDlqHKJ16A 8Lx3tqUdJNaegQNgusQG+1tN0chEmL4y3PaomfOpjwDlpAArDHGpVmmpoTd6qieJJncqpXcjR OmVur4rLQcVwdAlvXduttWnxigKoiuC8vh1nZzCexKFgGZk9/brOXHodE7Uf1jNX/qq+zjGt9 otS4+r1/vwMtW4jyIKd+30M6qLkdkmmcDkETnILIvgQZ4DofLpKfNLmOBVi0HiNliQAfy7Hfj gE+T1hKL/OaTzosQ49mBocWBJI02JCjLF4DShDQO1LGuaHoNPCc6KgnkzNLPhOAv6YMCVenhJ 9+HNso2HnBbCcHszAc0Fx6o+SBlnbqiYu5nr5BlMm/xhi3CCduxEG1QxG2bga728jKRx4wq/P Od3D0RFyUKzlPvoKtzUkFzO9wWxl4rDdnEh2CB1KZY5fnYLD3amURoJ3de1jKUd/TVVkKGcsk NB07KOJbVNEu4mnjSTofaiAWhptpPAyAfqqs0n3FW0XIsJBO5GasGtGOD7CNdhhzKwMpb9uao FRqBgeYNh0oiTxFqqqr8Z/eWFvDvXCFptfviYuLmPPJRX7vxsMXpdFR74X5TdkMVotgokiuGO LkqhngdyPO9uAq1L33ilmGdE/rhr9KGCG9fdwoFSykbdKa49AeBOwt8RluT1Os5mU5Ii80QPc B9HcVr1j2sf53IJfFON+IrFfX0mB5c9om9UM2Tc0z57NPus5v5S1SSoVOllTOnYs4QcJHGeWJ pvOINHE Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 06.06.2017 at 19:55, Pedro Magalhães wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just opened the vote on this RFC. > > The main goal of the RFC is to eliminate the inconsistency in arrays when > negative numeric keys are used explicitly and the following implicit keys > will start from zero. > > You can find the RFC here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/negative_array_index > The previous discussion: https://externals.io/thread/712 > And the PR (also some discussion): https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2383 > > Voting is open from now until 20/6/2017 18:00 UTC. I don't think that the current behavior makes much sense, but since it is well documented and it isn't a bug, changing it in a minor version wouldn't comply to our release process[1]. Therefore, I've voted against, but I'd be happy to see this improvement in PHP 8. [1] -- Christoph M. Becker