Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99343
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 77.244.243.85 cause and error)
References: <c6d2e29e-f0ba-efaf-7623-b773b9eb5a63@fleshgrinder.com>
 <633F3DBB-70B5-4BCB-A098-89222B6A24A0@gmail.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
 Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12a4c3f6-87d3-36c8-30b7-c2ebfeebb62b@fleshgrinder.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:11:42 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <633F3DBB-70B5-4BCB-A098-89222B6A24A0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="n6VSGWhCUQawgWVnMbwf8BCtxpuKKAPkh"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder)

--n6VSGWhCUQawgWVnMbwf8BCtxpuKKAPkh
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xGp3DdS7Ke6KbgpmWvA793SL7GxT2w724";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
 Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12a4c3f6-87d3-36c8-30b7-c2ebfeebb62b@fleshgrinder.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Class Naming
References: <c6d2e29e-f0ba-efaf-7623-b773b9eb5a63@fleshgrinder.com>
 <633F3DBB-70B5-4BCB-A098-89222B6A24A0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <633F3DBB-70B5-4BCB-A098-89222B6A24A0@gmail.com>

--xGp3DdS7Ke6KbgpmWvA793SL7GxT2w724
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 6/3/2017 4:07 PM, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>=20
> I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a
> "simple 50%+1 majority vote" doesn't really make sense if it's not a
> yes/no question.
>=20
> What if the vote splits 49/48/3? Does "do nothing" win because the
> other options didn't pass the winning post, even though some people
> would actually be happy with either option? I don't think there are
> many people who would rank the options as A > neither > B in this
> case.
>=20
> Perhaps it would be better to separate the vote in two: - Should
> coding standard be changed? Yes / No, 50%+1 required for change -
> Which style should be used if change is accepted? A / B, highest
> total wins regardless of proportion.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20

You are completely right, this makes no sense as it stands. Changed to
how you propose it, as it is the only thing that actually makes sense. ;)=


--=20
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger


--xGp3DdS7Ke6KbgpmWvA793SL7GxT2w724--

--n6VSGWhCUQawgWVnMbwf8BCtxpuKKAPkh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=jC3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n6VSGWhCUQawgWVnMbwf8BCtxpuKKAPkh--