Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99324 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92604 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2017 16:31:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2017 16:31:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.4 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.4 smtp4-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.4] ([212.27.42.4:39369] helo=smtp4-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/38-12681-DD291395 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:31:27 -0400 Received: from [172.16.0.21] (unknown [158.255.108.131]) (Authenticated sender: flaupretre@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C23019F5E7; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:31:19 +0200 (CEST) To: Dan Ackroyd Cc: Internals References: <1e99c642-e3b8-3445-82ac-f6cb6258e0b4@php.net> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:31:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Add support for stream-wrapped URLs in opcode cache From: francois@tekwire.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Laupretre?=) Hi Dan, Thanks for your comments. Both are fixed now. Regards François Le 02/06/2017 à 15:37, Dan Ackroyd a écrit : > On 25 May 2017 at 19:17, François Laupretre wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't know if it is still time for 7.2 but here is a new RFC to read and >> comment : >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/url-opcode-cache >> > The proposed version is just listed as 'next' - please could this be > specific, as next could mean next bug fix version. > > btw I presume https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1117 is a typo, as > it leads to "Fix ARG_INFO for levenshtein", which seems out of scope > for the RFC? > > > cheers > Dan