Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99320
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuQr0iu52yXsgUk82CTN-3h4NfJx+3xC3FREUTaYFiKZ1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB8JV1Pub_6ppV_2Nub90z0kpfKZikmxvg-aUUB6SQHSqC34vQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuQr0iu52yXsgUk82CTN-3h4NfJx+3xC3FREUTaYFiKZ1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:21:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB8JV1NWbotD-pWOptY7TX4rMWWzaH9x8Z1Ztfumb7Q4bFeWUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140104ab5159a0550fa0951"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal
From: krukowski.bartlomiej@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Bart=C5=82omiej_Krukowski?=)

--001a1140104ab5159a0550fa0951
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

PHP allows for using implicit references in arguments of function. In most
common case we have to mark that variable is an reference in head of
function, in other case we will receive fatal error (@see example -
http://ideone.com/7zkgQQ <http://ideone.com/7zkgQQ>). There is an option to
use variable as implicit reference (@see example - http://ideone.com/T6oF7C
<http://ideone.com/T6oF7C>), I think it should not be possible. Only
explicit references should be allowed (except objects).

Best regards

2017-06-02 14:19 GMT+02:00 Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>:

> On 2 June 2017 at 12:14, Bart=C5=82omiej Krukowski
> <krukowski.bartlomiej@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've created an account just now on wiki.php.net. My username:
> *bkrukowski*.
> > I would like to create RFC about references in PHP. Could you please gi=
ve
> > me an access?
> >
>
> From the RFC howto https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto:
>
> "Email internals@lists.php.net to measure reaction to your intended
> proposal. State who would implement the feature, or whether the
> proposal is only a =E2=80=9Cconcept=E2=80=9D. Proceed with an RFC if feed=
back is not
> negative or if a detailed RFC will clarify the proposal. "
>
> Can you give a rough outline of the proposal ?
>
> cheers
> Dan
>

--001a1140104ab5159a0550fa0951--