Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99300 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51421 invoked from network); 31 May 2017 16:16:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2017 16:16:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.192.172 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.172 mail-pf0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.172] ([209.85.192.172:36826] helo=mail-pf0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/6E-43873-25CEE295 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:16:20 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m17so12742439pfg.3 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:16:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+PJF/M5a6URsB4eBAqAElIUXWh4DqZNZ1WwklX3Wufc=; b=11LdI4H22Td2lb1pmCZKkuz1w33fMTlgqikVlDyxurbdw0BbXRszFfBMtWCUdBx3IM 0wHvdfYgNd3OEIc5jg4xgpfKZxTosXAuh0uYbqYbzPapGdrua6d1Xa6vksV1tpR9RHH4 EuNJ8VQqNVDefdXEV6gFZTfh5TnYFYE0A8bYJ4fIUjK6Ou6i2AEEb0Z4mWPa+XCznctd FE9Ug6r4V5AwSxzmjIz95YStixNn9lGUIg0BdjpB2VQAgaHAE5dHQ43sG44po/zwsSyJ hdXXV3j1YeaHgZqWtaMIdlXdWIMkFs5bsfh2MlvpyUkMNB+vVeMUkEwIXWTErho+Cd+1 lLig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+PJF/M5a6URsB4eBAqAElIUXWh4DqZNZ1WwklX3Wufc=; b=fkP9iav3IIl3WORyaL519rAQmbWWc4ia8Rwj2qN1f6KWfWHV4ZmDIFgdb3IcM6dBuM jgrrXoXzQz4n0dqDnCChuV2uSVPJvHjqJ2Hu3fnpzwU7c8FdNXPgITUcoVhtQHsh9sp1 YZklfA2RILAPAeKGKCz9grxT91ULapg1fHWq8zw+1CRBmjV8VLxJrYTXo35Q+Mu33uYl bNaAU5Nlujcmg6bIwfKsqX077RkZ2rP8uz0iN6iVhoHbyMpmUFmPjbyNOF2ZdJkRF+BR 54ij/NAKzQ1ZxzQhjd1RrLMqJ2ODVUJAEtlrHOC4c01JmPY+O7AQy3GotROZ+l36P8HC IzrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAqUPy9YywuDSdpka9yB1on4ddsMqJqoMNWP+hWhgTJKthsz66k 5ceBNs5abVNtu3PB3Z7W1zrts5ucWujI X-Received: by 10.84.215.149 with SMTP id l21mr2763085pli.31.1496247375554; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.151.163 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [81.143.203.71] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:16:15 +0100 Message-ID: To: David Walker Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Post-Discussion]: E_WARNING when using array-index on non valid container From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) Hi David, On 11 January 2017 at 15:42, David Walker wrote: > Joe had requested renewed discussion on the accepted RFC[1] and my proposed > PR[2] be brought forward again for implementation discussion, and to come > up with a resolution. > > Any > thoughts on a better implementation, or other use cases that need attention > would be appreciated. > Please could you give us an update on the status of the implementation, and are you still looking for advice on how what would be needed to complete it? cheers Dan Ack ps for the record, I just spent an hour today trying to figure out why code equivalent to $foo = null; echo $foo['bar'] wasn't triggering an error, so I hope this can make it for 7.2