Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99268
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 212.232.25.164 cause and error)
References: <9dffe898-e550-c6d6-46bd-86dcf74735ea@fleshgrinder.com>
 <9652e487-86e7-20b7-ca1f-bd28a94f514b@gmail.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
 Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <86dba466-a764-522b-6990-39fd7668a79c@fleshgrinder.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 19:43:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9652e487-86e7-20b7-ca1f-bd28a94f514b@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="iAwP3imAXNBg5g1GrCsEHCESfRG3WxO86"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Class Naming in Core
From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder)

--iAwP3imAXNBg5g1GrCsEHCESfRG3WxO86
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="HRCsK2o9hk9LxEwHUhhdrqxqfhLo1LcfJ";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>
To: php-internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
 Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <86dba466-a764-522b-6990-39fd7668a79c@fleshgrinder.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Class Naming in Core
References: <9dffe898-e550-c6d6-46bd-86dcf74735ea@fleshgrinder.com>
 <9652e487-86e7-20b7-ca1f-bd28a94f514b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9652e487-86e7-20b7-ca1f-bd28a94f514b@gmail.com>

--HRCsK2o9hk9LxEwHUhhdrqxqfhLo1LcfJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey Stas!

On 5/30/2017 1:00 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
>> People are complaining over at Reddit [1]
>=20
> Isn't it what Reddit is for? ;)
>=20

I guess it is. ;)

>> I know that this is probably a topic nobody cares much about, at least=

>> we did not end up in this kind of bikeshedding in the UUID discussion
>> thread, but it is after all an important question when designing a lan=
guage.
>=20
> I personally don't think it is a very important decision, since nothing=

> much would change either way, but my preference would be:
>=20
> 1. If there's an established acronym, keep it (GMP, DOM, XML, HTTP).
> 2. If it's just words, use CamelCase.
>=20
> Second preference is all CamelCase, treating acronyms as a single word
> (e.g. RpcOverHttpsViaXml).
>=20

Exactly how I see it. I am only asking to decide on one of both and put
it into our coding standard so people who keep on complaining can be
pointed there, and we're done.

--=20
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger


--HRCsK2o9hk9LxEwHUhhdrqxqfhLo1LcfJ--

--iAwP3imAXNBg5g1GrCsEHCESfRG3WxO86
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=M8sl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iAwP3imAXNBg5g1GrCsEHCESfRG3WxO86--