Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99235 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57120 invoked from network); 29 May 2017 20:01:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2017 20:01:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jakub.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jakub.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jakub.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.174 mail-yw0-f174.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.174] ([209.85.161.174:32820] helo=mail-yw0-f174.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3B/36-34073-EFD7C295 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 16:01:02 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p73so31975164ywp.0 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:01:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=zTIVRa3WnldCF9m3JnxjZyVxDDyay2cNQZI1Tbafelc=; b=IAWsN8Qk0S+oFndxhTcpmKic6DKLq4XeU1PoJHj3u05sinuYkrPfbGcqvOPRPYZqc6 W9R6u2RQEHOckx2nx0uvqx83vl4xMeOF793HNZfOmFX/itG0GKnjODE+GBDKLZq6fHNc ISLABgBQBw7D0v+3js7qUtpAECi4dTMpYe+aQqT7hh2EzPX/GZnw8r8qgmQHmhAZ+qgM Jo+UbWycDlTDRkBVajrPVaYKDcuP+2A7XI/H+kBbVYKdr7q0aqOUqDBQSOGyfyDcfabC rrqv6mdKeTdYFlCRy16RgcVISJTRpmh1skNXSTRzNpjN18C1B8Vg0/+QevXI3Whhc1Qs XwJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zTIVRa3WnldCF9m3JnxjZyVxDDyay2cNQZI1Tbafelc=; b=e3uRJBfnq+RashAVLSAj3pFJhB6itpIqXgpocpgyqyO6v2/ZRmmOxeVdLEN7NzfTAt OS6Thd9t6lmGfrCTWd4+9FsuNdfCWeQRrSP8yDcpHl697oLjEbTIVbAPs7/How8p87CR FewZMTTgy0UjWMy1uAkwXyAgFINBNVQH86lNmQdG0uGBeiT9CcYQDANkPN+bxsuXIJM6 I967JGQ2dbmud06B6582zqeOdQaR0FIdLa5DyRJwSnN6Dlv4iE3LaeuC6KqyQpWxoP+9 vsyi4N8q83YTmDJgH2J4CnRPUm/A2kuMGeAVwLsgY+fDIe2/8Fpr0ICEYQKGqnxbla7u lgXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBOWfuna7V0mEKmQLVKBDeTOmEL6t7b8w7il3rIwT+jT26AEtlL UO/gEPoqg5ZC696qA5v16hMXDxsVxw== X-Received: by 10.13.217.129 with SMTP id b123mr14242135ywe.105.1496088059352; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:00:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jakub.php@gmail.com Received: by 10.129.85.81 with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 13:00:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 21:00:59 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OnZCayOWcOHOEEe85GSgJxUhjTM Message-ID: To: Niklas Keller Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fa4645499b90550af2510" Subject: Re: [RFC] Distrust SHA-1 Certificates From: bukka@php.net (Jakub Zelenka) --001a114fa4645499b90550af2510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: > Morning Internals, > > I have updated the RFC to use a "min_signature_bits" setting instead. > > Wouldn't be better use security levels instead as it is in OpenSSL? Of course I mean just for sig level to not re-implement everything. Basically having sig_level or something like that... --001a114fa4645499b90550af2510--