Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99209 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87578 invoked from network); 27 May 2017 20:30:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 May 2017 20:30:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1:25520]) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ECSTREAM id 80/00-21954-1D1E9295 for ; Sat, 27 May 2017 16:30:09 -0400 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zoeslam@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zoeslam@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zoeslam@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.179 mail-wr0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.179] ([209.85.128.179:33700] helo=mail-wr0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5F/50-14138-3BED9295 for ; Sat, 27 May 2017 16:16:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w50so17053612wrc.0 for ; Sat, 27 May 2017 13:16:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NcpUCYh4CrQLZSjNmd/Wsd4BVm/CNmnkY5PDMWhNRrU=; b=Yavy4OX3dybAS1Fp28sB+SJ7rx95PhiBgo2LM49o9x4nML3KOD4Lj+kcrGtQ7uEyyZ Fnt9anYaopHk4osH5ZJYaidVualaFyFBtdC0qagNLQVYllb7OXcyMwwgJ0iO6Jn5PxR3 XJmz2ZxRpuMCHO5xAVXMcbNYWnq0CgOt9J5/iBp6Lo70/MOn3Xl/6LftZpKcX/S0oUXw X9jBoxwsScBYGZB3Q5xMXQpnL01xn7LExtuknKGtlEQ14kSst9ETDUyDU8+fTMflfs9G 6hpZwIlUBQ+2zTgi3BWtej14SLZ1SRWu7zjwyVQ25wDc8Ky5RCI4EnXdr0ZAAfoohm3j TJ6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NcpUCYh4CrQLZSjNmd/Wsd4BVm/CNmnkY5PDMWhNRrU=; b=X0kbiwhVn2R8eUMlMqThndSVwZOpd1nXTPJG7XF+tZHUi+nsdMsDc4MS8GA2AFubCs eFNl833UO0bHojhVebJqPWO+g1iMa8lVVDX90y/rWnfqsJHPabyyTsG3mCV7PDllU81D q8kXmmx7a/mXy2mVfdY8MnTPy25p9lmIwM8gISii3OogXlNStEe4Z8wVMmlXQBMjRilA dZcqRzgjfIwfuMGBeYPLvJ+pRQnXjELiDeCJMZVel9OPzVEEWyGp8RJjg7o6EUuPvjUO xdZEbysX3DlxJ1WYqUJ/jJSOZ04OJbOIJa4P8swaUvgttYeSQ1syw3eRW4PbF6jT3mnG 4CLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCswu+gBK5a7Fh5Y0wRou5oCjZxQ1hinYuGxZMEu1DdB5YCDvCU lsWGqNm9YCnieeYgmfY= X-Received: by 10.223.178.85 with SMTP id y21mr5693540wra.58.1495916208123; Sat, 27 May 2017 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (2-234-178-60.ip224.fastwebnet.it. [2.234.178.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm5912164wrc.52.2017.05.27.13.16.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 May 2017 13:16:46 -0700 (PDT) To: Rasmus Schultz , PHP internals References: Message-ID: <0cbdb67a-e711-8147-ddf0-b9cd41bb4d96@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 22:16:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it-IT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Parameter type widening RFC From: zoeslam@gmail.com (Filippo Tessarotto) > The feature, as implemented, will allow accidental omission of type-hints Hi, stated the purpose of `declare(strict_types=1)` and that this is used by developers and libraries that actually crave for strictness, would it be votable an RFC that reintroduce the Warning only with this declare active? Filippo Tessarotto