Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99202 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10407 invoked from network); 26 May 2017 12:23:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2017 12:23:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rhsoft.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rhsoft.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain rhsoft.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rhsoft.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:23125] helo=mail.thelounge.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 80/C4-10292-74E18295 for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:23:36 -0400 Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3wZ4zl160FzXMl for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 14:23:31 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <269187f4-5924-a7cc-9163-40134546451f@fleshgrinder.com> <2dca6983-bbde-6042-6608-a593df2e85ed@gmx.de> Message-ID: <35177214-db24-5bc8-2020-37b2951259a2@rhsoft.net> Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:23:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2dca6983-bbde-6042-6608-a593df2e85ed@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-CH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Parameter type widening RFC From: lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net") Am 26.05.2017 um 14:16 schrieb Christoph M. Becker: > On 26.05.2017 at 12:16, Niklas Keller wrote: > >> 2017-05-26 10:35 GMT+02:00 Andrey Andreev : >> >>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Dan Ackroyd >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The RFC specifically didn't mention LSP....because that is separate >>>> from co/contravariance. It's unfortunate for other people to be >>>> throwing the two around at you with a lack of precision. >>> >>> Perhaps this was the issue ... I was under the impression that LSP was >>> used as (part of) the motivation for the RFC. >>> >>> The rest is pretty clear, though thanks for the lengthy explanation. :) >> >> Sorry for the delay and confusion. As Nikita already mentioned, it's a >> consequence of LSP, not directly what LSP is about. > > Indeed, it is not about LSP, so I suggest to fix the note in UPGRADING[1] does that also fix the issue https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=74394