Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:99019 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17930 invoked from network); 12 May 2017 02:04:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 May 2017 02:04:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:53954] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/04-11470-73815195 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 22:04:42 -0400 Received: (qmail 13765 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2017 02:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f177.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.177) by 0 with ESMTPA; 12 May 2017 02:04:36 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m91so31637672qte.3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 19:04:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBc40eUkwwdUrcfH9Zvj4evylhle3jFPY51LvzeYYPfe3PHXppj bISqCpaD7zah3Ja4wHLPlXlyqV0+tQ== X-Received: by 10.200.38.103 with SMTP id v36mr1635679qtv.157.1494554669289; Thu, 11 May 2017 19:04:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.102.215 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2017 19:03:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1578bed4-987a-08f0-5b89-b90925a718a4@rhsoft.net> References: <690015854.1384408.1492163148986.JavaMail.zimbra@pieterhordijk.com> <1578bed4-987a-08f0-5b89-b90925a718a4@rhsoft.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:03:48 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: "lists@rhsoft.net" Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11404a002919e6054f4a20f6" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improve hash_hkdf() parameter From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11404a002919e6054f4a20f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:21 AM, lists@rhsoft.net wrote: > Am 09.05.2017 um 23:36 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:55 PM, lists@rhsoft.net > lists@rhsoft.net> > wrote: >> >> ..... PLEASE STOP riding that dead horse - it's even annoying for >> users following the devel-list how you argue on that opic over >> months - nonody shares your view, that's it - accept it >> >> >> Apparently not. >> You obviously do not understand what is the issue >> > > i understand the issue - you just don't accept that it was refused - > period - deal with it You obviously DO NOT understand issue here. I'm requesting "Should be in the manual" hash_hkdf() example(s) that justify current function signature. The example(s) should be common/recommended/secure. I've had enough argument that current hash_hkdf() is reasonable, but no proper example is shown yet. If you have any, I appreciate it. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11404a002919e6054f4a20f6--