Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98722 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54684 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2017 00:09:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Apr 2017 00:09:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:46872] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/65-02743-34140E85 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:09:41 -0500 Received: (qmail 83464 invoked by uid 89); 2 Apr 2017 00:09:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f178.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.178) by 0 with ESMTPA; 2 Apr 2017 00:09:35 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i34so90098811qtc.0 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 17:09:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3QdTqi79bABi6/uPmNpZhwSTj44h4kHHCgiV6+oVg77cruu4YX50xpLvuTc8UoQ+mlipDY49/GD8JO/A== X-Received: by 10.200.40.210 with SMTP id j18mr10860460qtj.272.1491091768876; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.232 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 17:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 09:08:48 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Sara Golemon Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11405b4e36399b054c23db1b Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SHA3 is very slow From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11405b4e36399b054c23db1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Sara, On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > I noticed that our SHA-3 is inefficient. > > > Entirely possible. Feel free to improve it. :D I would like to, but it wouldn't happen in short time. I also would like to have SHAKE algorithm. Perhaps, hash_shake($also, $msg, $len [, $binary=false])? Anyone, please improve it :D Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11405b4e36399b054c23db1b--