Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98712 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91725 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2017 03:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Apr 2017 03:24:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.176 mail-wr0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.176] ([209.85.128.176:35517] helo=mail-wr0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D0/00-26066-56D1FD85 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:24:23 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k6so112353469wre.2 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Mp01XOXrJuIQYExbTi1I/rO8N12JJxob7wHHjZpSAN0=; b=LMMssW2TjkRzS5KwfiGyZ9dqeGZ9vG1dQ1Ets41ZALnEXxGxfrPGiZ0v7+Cr+4fA4B uGbm78103yGK4VIbteZt7H42tN1zQNXs+j2MJzqT4vnRJMr6EGBwuPmsAtd+T6NalNEp M9y/8OlF0TwT2FHki10IhyumCWI6OOh4hYSfMPrRijivrjNKiU7G2T//Sl9L5hhjsknL +EYJbnqf+HIbYcPcN0vtP5678fyzed0Qz0Q0l02gp6HrzmQKgD3sr3yw/ZfsqpL/MBbX Oe3uJQpszuNGTI2N8JSnngBjwPB1w1dM74x2OW4wqjFbQ1CbT99LoTBA27hXpelOzpRu T+qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mp01XOXrJuIQYExbTi1I/rO8N12JJxob7wHHjZpSAN0=; b=L3EDv5phLMYtDMUrxcT4gMLIMGKAl4XAhkBrAd5XteB2rQ50SgFAGpf3NmZd5He2Du EuPOUkFi6igmpP/U1SfkOjfujwcHBSatj0u2a0IXqS7EN76fRvokj5W2RI82/FrlZKgm zTStOcQgZQ5jgt+lZpBqx99hPt7VE41Htwd4Ev5WxohRETTuBrT9sPrYr9Rw0gI/SpGU SL7m/T18uWh+cm7ElT5VFuKy0UONVO+pR7Mfv1xMMJXw9f+s9LOyuSr5e/8Eq9v2FIyZ GLU/IYLyWGMz+K6I591FqT8/+FWK/7iptU3I5E2DQdUmCMtnTPVn/qbm9K6nbjsith3x m0cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1hEr2Ts6Rc9YpsScG7VMoNcs83loShBAMDmme7dzjpN9qm7CJoC4TiBMp5A4hCU0/Nqhx/BKZGFVCyFA== X-Received: by 10.223.152.237 with SMTP id w100mr5810093wrb.72.1491017058676; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:24:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.223.179.24 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [73.9.224.155] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:24:18 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R2l6Y52EGogKnYAOO41jbbp4HR8 Message-ID: To: Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SHA3 is very slow From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I noticed that our SHA-3 is inefficient. > Entirely possible. Feel free to improve it. :D