Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98631 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46253 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2017 02:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2017 02:26:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:41200] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/0C-40046-F45D5D85 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:26:24 -0500 Received: (qmail 4862 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2017 02:26:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f173.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.173) by 0 with ESMTPA; 25 Mar 2017 02:26:19 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i34so5111387qtc.0 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:26:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2T3uiE9PKZb6bMnvbYWjHHtWDcLP1uaOK2jx3GBLoBHl686QF+j8t3CdnlW2JCFguFEtV36htec/JSKQ== X-Received: by 10.237.57.164 with SMTP id m33mr11867774qte.293.1490408773127; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.232 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:25:32 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Cc: Andrey Andreev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114103067e2cdf054b84d5ab Subject: [RFC] [VOTE] Improve hash_hkdf() parameter From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a114103067e2cdf054b84d5ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, Since hash_hkdf() is in PHP 7.1.2, I start vote from today. Current hash_hkdf() function signature does not make sense. - hash_hkdf() is simple hash_hmac() extension, yet it has totally different signature. - Return value is binary unlike other hash functions. - The signature is insecure. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improve_hash_hkdf_parameter Current signature is overly optimized very limited crypto operation and cannot be optimal by above reasons. Fortunately, almost all users are not using current hash_hkdf(). It's only from 7.1.2 to 7.1.4 now. We should avoid yet another new inconsistent and insecure function. It would be better to be fixed ASAP, IMHO. Vote start: 2017-03-25 Vote end: 2017-04-06 UTC 23:59:59 Thank you for voting. -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a114103067e2cdf054b84d5ab--