Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98630 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44145 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2017 02:02:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2017 02:02:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:41124] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4F/AB-40046-7CFC5D85 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:02:49 -0500 Received: (qmail 947 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2017 02:02:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f170.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.170) by 0 with ESMTPA; 25 Mar 2017 02:02:43 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i34so4932089qtc.0 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:02:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3aOqkziPZ5ioQ1MkaKiolrwy1ntdDlx4X9Z643CzFneOrYwcHaGhiqHykvE59XSuGYbKsQ1E3WYNUbbA== X-Received: by 10.200.55.152 with SMTP id d24mr10517814qtc.1.1490407357043; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:02:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.232 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:01:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:01:56 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c5e72169d1a054b8481a1 Subject: Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Improve hash_hkdf() parameter From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a113c5e72169d1a054b8481a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > This would be final RFC. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improve_hash_hkdf_parameter > > Simpler is better. > I made introduction simpler. > If there aren't comments, I'll start vote in a few days. > I noticed master is merged to 7.1 branch. http://php.net/manual/en/function.hash-hkdf.php I'll update RFC, but current hash_hkdf() signature and return value does not make much sense. Reasons why it does not make much sense are described in the RFC. It would be better to fix ASAP. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a113c5e72169d1a054b8481a1--