Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98626
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain me.com designates 17.142.194.252 as permitted sender)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:08:31 +0100
To: internals@lists.php.net, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3942113e-f83a-444f-bbc2-462c70d67c65@Spark>
In-reply-to: <61DC1C28-CAF2-45F4-8D9F-A66BEA2E90B1@gmail.com>
References:
 <CAFMT4Nrt7XPMnELoAGLu=sSRCTCtzPCTaSE8HJjKfHjDXOXU_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <97bb5051-6413-b78a-e981-ad8858caec4c@gmail.com>
 <8d4ee559-1ad2-4d65-ae4f-207e59f056e3@Spark>
 <61DC1C28-CAF2-45F4-8D9F-A66BEA2E90B1@gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=58d57cca_6b8b4567_52b5
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discuss] Arrow Functions
From: ilija.tovilo@me.com

--58d57cca_6b8b4567_52b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Rowan

I see. I still think a simple poll would be useful to choose the least co=
ntroversial syntax.
Otherwise I fear that the R=46C might get rejected out of superficial rea=
sons.

Regards,
Ilija


On 7 =46eb 2017, 21:07 +0100, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins=40gmail.com>, =
wrote:
> Hi Ilija,
>
> On 7 =46ebruary 2017 18:58:15 GMT+00:00, ilija.tovilo=40me.com wrote:
> > And also, have you considered letting people vote for their preferred=

> > arrow function syntax=3F
> > I kinda don=E2=80=99t think we=E2=80=99re gonna find an agreement as =
there are so many
> > different opinions.
>
> The problem with voting on alternative syntaxes is precisely that there=
 *are* so many different options. Designing a vote with multiple options =
that gives an answer people are happy with is a whole science in itself.
>
> I think the best we can do is have a =22without prejudice=22 vote on a =
single proposal - if it is declined, a new proposal can be made after a s=
uitable period of reflection. This has already happened once with this ve=
ry topic, this R=46C having emerged from a previous one being rejected.
>
> That doesn't mean we can't discuss other syntaxes, but just opening up =
all possible options to a vote doesn't really help IMHO.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Rowan Collins
> =5BIMSoP=5D
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>

--58d57cca_6b8b4567_52b5--