Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98460 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40120 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2017 18:58:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2017 18:58:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam.baratz@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adambaratz@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam.baratz@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.50 mail-it0-f50.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.50] ([209.85.214.50:38210] helo=mail-it0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/21-31244-CC5A1C85 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:58:20 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m27so72463152iti.1 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nBwOPnGiJUkF6O23A0FotC+cCY6TWnlNSge9wLNK+sc=; b=jIYkUDiSR9EEdERCgnE7t55ZzW04C6IZWHDgaowfDNG7/kJUkoI4Ra2MBZHsGnBX0Z S+QceBOZEjjmt1fWvRQ0NckfRAyKY5QwNuifmaC686Nn02hE+zzUHArTwj1IbRpQQ+XT 0sY/kSmIiQZykH9p0wPaSRdKKqhX5OvxMTgqFd6UfiPwg8rSDqeC9AXCk9py9zH4xJUf DHCmEQYbJdszahhiS3GS1xi3JvYeb3GXCFUA9ObgtUoRmHMW3+957z+rRahNpIDznyNd iGkggZTJ6opzxi7sja7bPjS1uJ/O/CMH4AwytX52w4rc2uMEfq/oNNcK4UwTU7U7l8mx 6LEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kh598P86WqUBoBrcQhDUzA7AXuHBKT9Hi5xAE/G+faMEycB36ZMIVXF7dSr8hfDA== X-Received: by 10.36.181.23 with SMTP id v23mr21013778ite.100.1489085898135; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com (mail-it0-f43.google.com. [209.85.214.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h91sm3317463ioi.24.2017.03.09.10.58.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id m27so72462852iti.1 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.36.19.133 with SMTP id 127mr12623967itz.3.1489085897241; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8509e280-b58b-d5a9-8e12-25665f55d2c2@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <8509e280-b58b-d5a9-8e12-25665f55d2c2@free.fr> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:58:06 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11463362f22a7d054a50d320 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposing a new 'cache_key' streams operation From: adambaratz@php.net (Adam Baratz) --001a11463362f22a7d054a50d320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > This PR creates a mechanism to be used by opcode caches to determine > whether a stream-wrapped URI is cacheable, and the key to use when > caching it. > Thanks for sharing this. Very interesting idea. Have you posted an RFC yet? That'll help lay out the bigger questions and guide the conversation. There are some notes here if you haven't done one before: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto Thanks, Adam --001a11463362f22a7d054a50d320--