Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98418 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32951 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2017 10:33:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2017 10:33:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:38532] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 14/B1-27071-48C8EB85 for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:33:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B02A10C0FB; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:33:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:33:36 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl To: Sebastian Bergmann cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <314dd971-3a1f-4727-9074-ac0b4089ec97@php.net> Message-ID: References: <0e19e041-4834-c24a-4239-036ab38fbda1@php.net> <314dd971-3a1f-4727-9074-ac0b4089ec97@php.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] generating code from AST From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Am 07.03.2017 um 07:01 schrieb David Walker: > > > When/if there are changes to AST, having a tool like these in core > > would require them to be updated at the same time. > > Exactly. > > > Would this concept also want to extend to a VLD-esque extension as well for > > the same reasons? I'd be receptive for abilities to expose the core > > internal ast/ops to userland more easily as a core extension > > Having a bytecode disassembler in core would also be nice, yes. Because installing an extension is too hard? It sounds like reinventing the wheel. cheers, Derick