Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98367
Return-Path: <netmo.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 51530 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2017 07:26:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2017 07:26:29 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=netmo.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=netmo.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.169 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: netmo.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.169 mail-yw0-f169.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.161.169] ([209.85.161.169:33440] helo=mail-yw0-f169.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 24/03-16445-4A776B85 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:26:28 -0500
Received: by mail-yw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id s15so2736653ywg.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:26:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=uEcBN9GP3bRXQHjvRd4q7PwWrk/NHGfIo7hp8pMkFbQ=;
        b=KFFCcfGFp36qbbWlvMmn+vq6yxVck7r/1OH/5kbpUeHwb5nDqGkpCPwLSOqToZQW0o
         3EFuA1Isp9i6DD9ZmKrE1yKuYNj1lmiIcHBTi7whe3yR54HF97v4gbk2Uy9sYbcsT9yE
         LyFF7SYuI7p6PwNyHgiAat605PwVhGqTEzEPJhpxihzh07GgWlfkeLUJjCPBzywIxHgt
         QT3zzg9naiXki7JWFQsfNoa33c71rsOL5BkoMtj6lwf4cRpxcRuGM0vGXVG7S4ng/yJC
         270hxpJvipKJimNi4+EbFMOEsV42rYcvHvP4tk/v70OPmFp+xCyYcMYm8yBFlKBkRcTb
         5pxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=uEcBN9GP3bRXQHjvRd4q7PwWrk/NHGfIo7hp8pMkFbQ=;
        b=Oy0CuYVDepM12iget62+Os6pSl0Sbo+x+2FthWmLKZ+gPRE76oWgkLMHq6eNotgIOG
         eW7rU47jVcTalidq0vtxZ1OvRD3Kos0p2FyOuR7yluVAbJcR8mjOVEG8nti7FyziUHEz
         s+ajpc4G17ksigjwZoRTQzCkb+NyCQhKCmBZ89eOgm2tK8U9vVhECzytyV+EUwIwff0M
         HT0E4aedACIXny0zYKYjAlzFr9LIRcJFe452Bal8HBStwopF3aKnA9voC4ET+rvszuF/
         EZHvaBfd1s/ZamDgB5meWoVQnd/lTrrpIpsiL5l79Ry8SG6t2Ng7grTcIuHTKZZlpI/p
         GfJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39miCpUCvua0vp4yognT4qWVV9zIRM8Y7BBMfPdhQHqTbjwBvLOUthDz0Bhy6psYlDOLGr+/m6epOAQ00Q==
X-Received: by 10.37.29.69 with SMTP id d66mr2363998ybd.62.1488353184725; Tue,
 28 Feb 2017 23:26:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.128.71 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:26:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADyq6sKbCG59CoZ9FFN6jRD7pdQk_NA8AzgOhVFvraaGVDAw0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOv67gsRwiR_aR=WJCqfJOeE8rUppuhD64m=sHZA6Vzjf59Diw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sKbCG59CoZ9FFN6jRD7pdQk_NA8AzgOhVFvraaGVDAw0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:26:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOv67gtOCbEHXjozx+vs1pSK-8i9nERy9c_TcRcm64gkHG-q8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11422b0ce041550549a63a02
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Allow abstract function override
From: netmo.php@gmail.com (Wes)

--001a11422b0ce041550549a63a02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Not sure i get what you mean. With "abstract functions" I include also
those in interfaces.

I haven't tried 7.2 yet, but i think what I'm proposing is already
supported (+ kelunik's RFC):

```
interface A{
    function x(stdClass $foo);
}

interface B extends A{
    function x($foo): stdClass;
}
```

I want this supported by abstract functions in abstract classes too.

--001a11422b0ce041550549a63a02--