Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98289 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33995 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2017 18:22:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Feb 2017 18:22:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.161.174 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.174 mail-yw0-f174.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.174] ([209.85.161.174:34352] helo=mail-yw0-f174.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/73-23443-FDA43A85 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:22:24 -0500 Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w75so70813376ywg.1 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:22:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xFOAofEKgoymhFaCqAIN+b+Me4HidHJCEMqBIDZuioI=; b=Xhw+mZ+yf4CZjHh0TVUeMlZ85j+GVU7iiKpbIRPmFyTlb81Chm356nCYAFMa4oUM4j oAbxfqpVd+Ph2lb1RiglEd/WCY38+t6kTK68yqNS7KNiBtq0CPvZoGHPkqUfP1JKvxzi dXVjxL7V799Jdvlf/dbk5TVFVlG90lstsVW692UkMD4Hj+ndsod5WsFhRqw6E0uPvC1U ySnQKZdugQ+09UAUawQjaZFqQpNAnCLwfZmr7dQuNkFikflQ1iWh3NXzAUvvvpF90/SN W+8ICRcee4Lmoc4hWSHI/XEpq9SRY6q6FboG/p7rVJFyn5ty9IGkETdAON5H4s8LlA09 jnvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xFOAofEKgoymhFaCqAIN+b+Me4HidHJCEMqBIDZuioI=; b=qXe4g1jYuKS76dpKZ92sdoEv7x6PoJWlSh3ndVW6qttaJcia96CLa8s75SMQEGndI7 UKUHtI4+ksj/lP28R/paQAVPrnd2XxKpLiYtoj4QpgDK6AmPlXzhZX+1ubSJ6CVhpn2n lGa8rUuVzE/fjpucj7nouKuLgHel8/vGvAkMLJqXPMv0eoz/6C3jf9I2mCaOyczGi/RK 0kjlPqL+5wkDPgb/Pat8suH4IkmYBJxwQ4eQSr5iWWYMaKPuddO83mmgfSGk8ThwP4aR ofEZ2/YI2WcU5xX7m40zghalkRHPbfDElDFXej1bsBjwhVh/a7S/S0BxZL3znFbD+snJ yiOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ncYAhbC2yR9Rlp/QR4udRoKYJVxIcmcpJ+6Wh2xqE/QKikffi5ebbausSM/Zw+Mq+x2JMH+PjU+w8ZSw== X-Received: by 10.129.91.139 with SMTP id p133mr9084223ywb.320.1487096541236; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:22:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.50.74 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [212.250.154.206] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:22:20 +0000 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=C3=A3es?= Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Binary String Deprecation From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 3 February 2017 at 12:47, Pedro Magalh=C3=A3es wrote: > Hello internals. > > After a *very* quiet period of discussion, I have now opened the vote for > the Binary String Deprecation. I thought this RFC was likely to pass easily. It's always slightly unfortunate when RFCs are either accepted or rejected by a small margin, particularly when there doesn't seem to have been any voices against it. Please could anyone who voted no, illuminate the rest of us as to why voting no was the correct option? cheers Dan