Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98267
Return-Path: <php@golemon.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 66268 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2017 03:50:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2017 03:50:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 74.125.82.179 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.179 mail-ot0-f179.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.179] ([74.125.82.179:36411] helo=mail-ot0-f179.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 87/55-33872-FE6EB985 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:50:09 -0500
Received: by mail-ot0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 32so4032859oth.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:50:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc;
        bh=XZw6SIrhOOmYuqx9QKnwLHQABf4lH1Rn2StVp3IkTXk=;
        b=M2NPlr8PVhwB4yPGOc13VKzQvLBPP3rAKDuGVmfiob7+VqMfhYyL+0+z+fDorTLOy9
         qE4jbN9wElj8wubQgojFFY1JJJhgmqD7hqpZBDCcHA1R3DrcWTTMQv1UTTuz9m8elgj3
         akHuJ1gP+GI+g843OBaTDZFF/xe8edajtbmf0LrZGoxLqoc1B4A+/3iSOeE+Jpap22ta
         Hyh6cLTnEYzEQnWdtvrbD6aADYBMsq6yC7X/9faPe7y18dXD2Jyn/hI4CsgZR04I2rtR
         P60U5QtRbSJuxSQZfOyuGxu5ty6c/B/mjSOHpb7bX9NTKlHqhWR8LNcsOa1pcg5qk/K1
         rTOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=XZw6SIrhOOmYuqx9QKnwLHQABf4lH1Rn2StVp3IkTXk=;
        b=ptMFU9E1fe3d2JkFHAXUw10EavvWwfC8RPDlrigeRPbwcLc6Qp/HCGfRe74l1zdtiE
         /InlYquek+jiQzaU4vhY68Ku0tkCY63aTXoouG1ZijEkUbUBuRFYyQtU4vqMQR0cuTh1
         WbRWjS0sAtlrT8ZfRviT9ZHMRt1uhg8ew9DxWCY1GAQm+xiRTeqLvoUTZABvKFEVO8KF
         tx3Tt5PZOdccIsF4YhYmunNoZIOr9enJBf0zpb3S5fnSraq/uGMpZG9MObIPTQw6F+ko
         7PO/ONVpz46l5i9sPp3VI7NlfFsUlJQTrIzbgOLUi8rV5HiTFAd2X5D9eA7ivIvqkaBG
         HIew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l1ZZxQJ4vKSXRbDH7Pk5EZjeYn56pD1mdK7x/2iaPapFOP66mg4/F3QsgyhGg9mq0gtTirOmnJTBt+Vg==
X-Received: by 10.157.52.253 with SMTP id t58mr592221otd.161.1486612205354;
 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:50:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: php@golemon.com
Received: by 10.157.14.104 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 19:50:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [73.9.224.155]
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuSKcXD+x1DcuhXvC2G4-v2UWos4YkUFMLbCGi1U7=ZUdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <459c6bef-8936-634a-9520-dbd65c35b7c7@fleshgrinder.com>
 <CAKws9z0a1uD2qmiWoOiN_HbftMzKROFijtzC3P1zwrS0XxvCaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+kxMuSKcXD+x1DcuhXvC2G4-v2UWos4YkUFMLbCGi1U7=ZUdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:50:04 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4fr7UQTqD7_29KX9ARPuwTXjmmA
Message-ID: <CAESVnVoJv7xKaHYekJHFOZx8zwyfgYry-PGJHL=LF4aZ6kZiVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>
Cc: Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Namespaces in Core
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com> wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 17:56, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com> wrote:
>> I'm taking all the No votes spawned by this thread to mean "we
>> don't want namespaced functions ever".
>
> That would be a bad assumption.
>
Confirmed. I'm not against EVER having namespaces, but we need to
decide one way or the other rather than piece-mealing it.

> aka it should be a separate discussion to whether libsodium should be
> included in PHP7.2.
>
+1

-Sara