Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98181 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96218 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2017 15:56:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2017 15:56:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@fleshgrinder.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@fleshgrinder.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 77.244.243.86 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@fleshgrinder.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.244.243.86 mx105.easyname.com Received: from [77.244.243.86] ([77.244.243.86:46507] helo=mx105.easyname.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/14-38491-1B9F5985 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 10:56:34 -0500 Received: from cable-81-173-135-7.netcologne.de ([81.173.135.7] helo=[192.168.178.20]) by mx.easyname.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ca2hR-0003DA-ID; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:56:29 +0000 Reply-To: internals@lists.php.net References: To: Scott Arciszewski , PHP Internals Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:56:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DNSBL-PBLSPAMHAUS: YES Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2 From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder) On 2/4/2017 4:20 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > Hi, > > This is a separate choice that people can vote for. It's not exactly > hidden; nor is it bundled into a single "Yes/No". > > The vote option concerns "permit an exception to the coding style" not > "change the coding style for everything". If anyone playing at home > wants to propose a separate RFC to update the coding style to allow > the use of namespaced functions in all future RFCs, it looks like (at > present count) at least 7 people would find such a proposal amicable. > (8 if you count me, though I don't have vote karma so my opinion is > irrelevant.) > > Regards, > > Scott Arciszewski > Chief Development Officer > Paragon Initiative Enterprises > Hey :) Oh don't get me wrong here, I have no problem with namespaced core stuff in general and I'd probably vote yes myself. The issue here is that it might (!) be that some of the people who actually can vote do not participate in the vote because they think "oh well, sodium sounds like an RFC I'm not interested in I'll let the others vote" and in reality the results change a thing that was the same since the inception of PHP. This is what I wanted to express with the comparison to the US Senate. ;) -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger