Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98161
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c87drfq+xFKdt6bcnpKHqUSzy-BSJdODTbmqKvgHsuELA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKws9z3+qrGner3K58rPqPdXW00YFCm4esrr5xhr6ettoRRVYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYw1Bofui58tr8gfyWu0YPdzoFokXZUZKSnnYbpCj11uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKws9z1SAkYj+zMOYhAcJD7t4FPrRz5Qv+9LE5Jr1zYUA68g3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAF+90c87drfq+xFKdt6bcnpKHqUSzy-BSJdODTbmqKvgHsuELA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 01:22:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAn=CzW0uuqoPWVuNEvOACFJ1+-+y4oM0B56skPhA+AsxQ3=Uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11444496e555c50547aa3c2a
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2
From: bowersbros@gmail.com (Alex Bowers)

--001a11444496e555c50547aa3c2a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 4 February 2017 at 00:04, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote=
:
> >
> > > Hi Scott and all,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.co=
m
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've opened the vote for the libsodium RFC.
> > >>
> > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium
> > >>
> > >> See https://externals.io/thread/626 for the previous discussion
> topics.
> > >>
> > >> The vote closes at 21:00 UTC (4 PM Eastern Time) next Friday.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I voted for "No, sodium_foo" syntax in order to be consistent with
> > > existing procedural APIs.
> > > 2/3 majority wouldn't fit nicely. What it would be if vote result is
> 51%
> > > vs 49%?
> > > More than half is good enough for 2nd vote choice. IMO.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Yasuo Ohgaki
> > > yohgaki@ohgaki.net
> > >
> > >
> > I like \Sodium\foo instead of sodium_foo, but it deviates from the norm=
.=E2=80=8B
> > =E2=80=8B If we're going to break the norm, we should do so on a strong=
er
> majority
> > than 50%+1.
> >
> > Also, I thought the rules changed so *_everything_* needed 2/3 now?=E2=
=80=8B
> >
>
> The usual rule is that "secondary" votes use 50% majority, to avoid bias =
in
> one direction or the other.
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>

Would it not be possible for _both_ to be supported? It would be just an
alias

--001a11444496e555c50547aa3c2a--